First, I have heard Dean's complete interviews about this "interesting theory" business and so far, so few are being contextually honest about the interviews. More or less, this is what he said, and put it into context about the blacked out portions of the 9/11 report.

He did say that one of the most interesting theories he heard about 9/11 was the Saudi's warned the US, BUT THAT HE DID NOT BELIEVE IT. He then went on to say that the reason why theories like this keep getting press is because of acts like the blacking out 28 pages of documents pertaining to those (Saudia Arabia) who have funded terrorists. His point was that to quelch theories like this, the government needs to be honest with the American People.

Now Dale, your assumptions about me wanting to bash Bush are incorrect and are the habitual practice of the right - deflect, toss an accusatory tid bit and not adequately offer information.

I made it clear I am biased about this and would like to hear of other opinions because of this bias. To me, it has nothing to do with "Bush Bashing" but instead that this is an alarming report.

IF this story is TRUE, does it not concern you at all? And does it not concern you at all that those reporting such reports are media outlets unlike those of the Star or Enquirer?