Well Luke,

        I think that this little note from Bush Campaign HQ is more than a little nutty. Also, since when is it wrong to say who you'd prefer to see as president? When did it become an issue to say I'd like to spend all my money to change the leadership of this country? He's not really going to do that but Soros is at least upfront and honest about what he thinks. I'd say this little note from the Bush campaign is...well...Un-American in it's portrayal of someone who is standing up for what he believes in. Putting his money where his mouth is.   

  It strikes me as more than a little amusing how bent out of shape Bushco gets when military folks or wealthy folks speak up about how they'd prefer to see somebody else in the White House . Suddenly it's wrong to say this and it's wrong to contribute to the debate...and they have to attack them at all costs and make them look bad.

   See it's ok for Bushco to play the "Nazi" card if it works to their advantage...in a letter seeking donations with intent to make a private citizen look bad...and by the way, in that article Soros does not call Bush a Nazi or compare him to one...he says only that the "with us or against us" crap reminds him of the Germans in his youth. Nazi is not thrown around.

Overall a cheap shot and typical of the shitty way political campaigns seem to feel they have to express themselves. I don't have to like it and I think I was correct in saying it was nuts.

                                                                     Reg