Icon Should have clarified point...
E
EEE (view)

Yes, Pat, I am angry at the Bush administration, and here is why:  He lost his way in the war with al Queda and bin Laden by taking an stupid, idiotic turn towards Iraq. 

There are plenty of reports of Bush missing bin Laden in Tora Bora years ago after 9/11.  That valuable assets where diverted from our true threats.   Now there is a report that Bush had three opportunities since 9/11 to take out the asshole believed to have beheaded Berg.  The Pentagon supposedly had this man in its sights three times but the political arm of the Whitehouse (Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle) nixed it. 

My point is that we should have invested 100 percent of our efforts into bin Laden and his jackass terrorists and stayed away from Iraq. 

When will you and your group thinkers get off of this goddamned Iraq/al Queda/9-11 connection and start thinking in terms of real issues?

For example, have you ever thought, "what if Iran, Syria, Pakistan and other Muslim countries join Iraq?"  And what it now means to the US that we have pissed off our allies to no end and might just need their help?  Do you think there is an endless supply of volunteer soldiers out there?  Or that now al Queda will use the abuses at Abu Grahib as a rallying point for Muslims throughout the world because the Bush adminstration has screwed up Iraq so badly? 

Or do you fall under a belief of the only good Iraqi or Muslim is a dead Iraqi or Muslim?  (I know this last line is harsh and maybe overboard, however, this sort of tactic is the same sort along the lines of the constant linking of 9/11 and Iraq). 

 

[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts