KentDB741
location: Buffalo, New York USA
listening to: The sweet music of YES
registered: 2001.11.12
posts: 1355
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Gene:Thanks for bringing up the subejct of e-mailing our elected
officials . . . In total, there are FIVE methods in which we can communicate with
our elected officials --- which I will list in order of most effective
to least effective:01) Send a FAX of a typed business letter. In the cases where the elected official has more than one office,
send a FAX to each and every office. FAXes are given preference,
and are placed at the top of the pile. This is all you need to know in
order to confirm that sending a FAX is the best possible method of
communicating.02) Typed business letters mailed through USPS (REGISTERED letter
ONLY, with RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED).By using this method, you have a receipt that your letter has been
received.03) A voice telephone call. This is used for appointment requests, or for possible follow-up
phone call to verify registered letter was received. Don't waste their
time or yours by calling for anything other than these two things.04) In-person visit to the office of elected official. Don't bother, unless you have a verified appointment with the
elected official. How you know whether you have a verified
appointment, is by a staff member calling you back to confirm
details of the meeting, such as time and location, and amount of
time you'll have with the official. If you do not receive such a phone
call, you are not officially on the list.05) Send them an e-mail. This is the least effective, because the e-mail is never read,
responded to, or anything other than DELETED. If you feel an
urge to write an e-mail --- spend the extra ten minutes and type
up a letter and FAX it to the office.In the case of each and every Congressperson --- each individual
House member receives approximately 25,000 e-mails per month.
In the case of each Senate office, it is 50,000 per month. The most
that ever happens with these e-mails, is they are collated by
subject matter, in order to gauge trends of concern in their
constituency. They are NEVER responded to, nor are they
acknowledged in any other manner.If you follow these guidelines, I guarantee that you will very likely
receive a reply that is HAND-SIGNED by the elected official. (They
also use signature facsimilie duplicating machines to sign letters
for mass mailing fund-raising, and subsequently, your matter is
considered of less importance if you receive a machine signed
letter).Over the years since I became interested in political matters and
developed a political consciousness, I have written my various
elected officials many, many times. The guidelines above are from
my own direct experience in interfacing with these people.I hope that this helps you understand why e-mailing an elected
official is really the worst way to go.KDB = Buffalo, NY USA
K
KentDB741
(view)
Gene:Thanks for bringing up the subejct of e-mailing our elected
officials . . . In total, there are FIVE methods in which we can communicate with
our elected officials --- which I will list in order of most effective
to least effective:01) Send a FAX of a typed business letter. In the cases where the elected official has more than one office,
send a FAX to each and every office. FAXes are given preference,
and are placed at the top of the pile. This is all you need to know in
order to confirm that sending a FAX is the best possible method of
communicating.02) Typed business letters mailed through USPS (REGISTERED letter
ONLY, with RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED).By using this method, you have a receipt that your letter has been
received.03) A voice telephone call. This is used for appointment requests, or for possible follow-up
phone call to verify registered letter was received. Don't waste their
time or yours by calling for anything other than these two things.04) In-person visit to the office of elected official. Don't bother, unless you have a verified appointment with the
elected official. How you know whether you have a verified
appointment, is by a staff member calling you back to confirm
details of the meeting, such as time and location, and amount of
time you'll have with the official. If you do not receive such a phone
call, you are not officially on the list.05) Send them an e-mail. This is the least effective, because the e-mail is never read,
responded to, or anything other than DELETED. If you feel an
urge to write an e-mail --- spend the extra ten minutes and type
up a letter and FAX it to the office.In the case of each and every Congressperson --- each individual
House member receives approximately 25,000 e-mails per month.
In the case of each Senate office, it is 50,000 per month. The most
that ever happens with these e-mails, is they are collated by
subject matter, in order to gauge trends of concern in their
constituency. They are NEVER responded to, nor are they
acknowledged in any other manner.If you follow these guidelines, I guarantee that you will very likely
receive a reply that is HAND-SIGNED by the elected official. (They
also use signature facsimilie duplicating machines to sign letters
for mass mailing fund-raising, and subsequently, your matter is
considered of less importance if you receive a machine signed
letter).Over the years since I became interested in political matters and
developed a political consciousness, I have written my various
elected officials many, many times. The guidelines above are from
my own direct experience in interfacing with these people.I hope that this helps you understand why e-mailing an elected
official is really the worst way to go.KDB = Buffalo, NY USA
posted 2004.05.18
posted on May 18th 2004
K
KentDB741
location: Buffalo, New York USA
listening to: The sweet music of YES
registered: 2001.11.12
posts: 1355
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Gadzooks! – Big Fat Freddy on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Gadzooks! – Eugene on May 18th, 2004-
Most effective methods of contacting CONGRESS (Important Info!) – KentDB741 on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Most effective methods of contacting CONGRESS (Important Info!) – Eugene on May 18th, 2004-
I have been trying to be helpful . . . – KentDB741 on May 18th, 2004-
Re: I have been trying to be helpful . . . – stark raving brad on May 19th, 2004
Re: Gadzooks! – natsthename on May 18th, 2004-
Divorced Republicans-Oh the hypocrisy of it all – Peter T. on May 18th, 2004-
Keeping things like they were...for the future – PRHs Ghost on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Keeping things like they were...for the future – natsthename on May 18th, 2004-
Paul (aka The Larryville Kid) cleaning up Kansas one right wing nutjob at a time – Reg on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Paul (aka The Larryville Kid) cleaning up Kansas one right wing nutjob at a time – PRHs Ghost on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Paul (aka The Larryville Kid) cleaning up Kansas one right wing nutjob at a time – Lee on May 18th, 2004-
Re: Paul (aka The Larryville Kid) cleaning up Kansas one right wing nutjob at a time – Reg on May 18th, 2004-
Reg, thanks for pointing that out . . . – KentDB741 on May 19th, 2004-
The TRUTH About Fred Phelps – KentDB741 on May 19th, 2004-
Re: The TRUTH About Fred Phelps – PRHs Ghost on May 19th, 2004
Re: Keeping things like they were...for the future – Marc on May 18th, 2004-
I'll tell you what the fuss is about – PatBrown on May 19th, 2004-
Re: I'll tell you what the fuss is about (rewritten. Pat, please read) – stark raving brad on May 19th, 2004-
Re: I'll tell you what the fuss is about (rewritten. Pat, please read) – PatBrown on May 19th, 2004-
Re: I'll tell you what the fuss is about – stark raving brad on May 20th, 2004
Re: I'll tell you what the fuss is about – Baerwald on May 19th, 2004-
Re: I'll tell you what the fuss is about – PRHs Ghost on May 19th, 2004
oh shit... – Reg on May 19th, 2004-
Reg, you drunken bastard! – Peter T. on May 19th, 2004
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
