the point of this exchange
Dan
location: WV➔VA➔FL➔WV➔OH
listening to: so many intros
registered: 1997.08.29
Is it worth arguing over? Probably not. But what this exchange does show is that it is impossible to disagree or argue openly or point out an inaccuracy in anything that Kent says. It is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that he's wrong about the use of the words capitol and capital. Yet he insists on laboring on about terrorism and a dumbed down education system while throwing in a personal insult to boot - instead of just admitting he was wrong. Is anyone else buying the 1800's dictionary argument? Anyone?
Dan
–--
throw out the hardware, let's do it right
Dan
(view)
Is it worth arguing over? Probably not. But what this exchange does show is that it is impossible to disagree or argue openly or point out an inaccuracy in anything that Kent says. It is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that he's wrong about the use of the words capitol and capital. Yet he insists on laboring on about terrorism and a dumbed down education system while throwing in a personal insult to boot - instead of just admitting he was wrong. Is anyone else buying the 1800's dictionary argument? Anyone?
Dan
–--
throw out the hardware, let's do it right
[
login] |
[
register]
you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts
