Icon Re: Distortions in F9/11 - Works both ways
E
EEE (view)

Here is a site that rebuts the reports of erros in Moore's F/9/11

http://dailykos.com/main/6

Go down about half to two thirds of the page and then you will see a place where you can read different sections of rebuttals.

But this leads me to a question - Moore has never claimed to have made a partisan documentary; from the start he has made his intentions clear. Unlike places like FauxNews. So how can something that is clear in its meaning necessarily be "propaganda"?

And I'd still like to hear of errors that are observed by others.

posted 2004.07.23
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts