Yes, there are some things I am firm and probably unmoveable on. Especially those items where the evidence is clear to me. Take FauxNews. For them to say "fair and balanced" is a blatant lie. Even now internal memos from the head news guy (Moody) tell the news division to slant things to the right. And to claim otherwise is like The Nation magazine claiming, "hey, we're not liberal or libertarian in our outlook."
The odd thing is that the other day O'Lielly actually admitted that the FauxNews channel probably does lean conservative.
Where the bias comes in is where a proponent of FauxNews claims it is "fair and balanced" in face of all the available evidence that is out there. Now that behavior fits the standard definition of "bias."
