My heart is pounding with rage after reading Kevin G's post. All of you people who call
yourselves "pro life" are not, in fact, for life. You are "pro birth", and clearly don't give a
shit what happens to these children after they are born. Poverty, addiction, illness,
abandonement, foster care, abuse. It goes on and on. And are any of you taking
responsibility - adopting, becoming foster parents, volunteering to help babies with
AIDS? I would be incredibly surprised to hear a yes from any of you right-wing
self-righteous morality spouting....creeps. How about more SEX EDUCATION? More
free condoms? Or birth control pills? And by the way, the more children that are born to
teenagers, the more need for social programs, which you all don't like either. And by the
way - girls are beginning their menstruation cycle at the average age of 9 now - rendering
them capable of pregnancy. Do you think they should have children?
S
Sarah
(view)
My heart is pounding with rage after reading Kevin G's post. All of you people who call
yourselves "pro life" are not, in fact, for life. You are "pro birth", and clearly don't give a
shit what happens to these children after they are born. Poverty, addiction, illness,
abandonement, foster care, abuse. It goes on and on. And are any of you taking
responsibility - adopting, becoming foster parents, volunteering to help babies with
AIDS? I would be incredibly surprised to hear a yes from any of you right-wing
self-righteous morality spouting....creeps. How about more SEX EDUCATION? More
free condoms? Or birth control pills? And by the way, the more children that are born to
teenagers, the more need for social programs, which you all don't like either. And by the
way - girls are beginning their menstruation cycle at the average age of 9 now - rendering
them capable of pregnancy. Do you think they should have children?
posted 2002.11.08
posted on November 8th 2002
