Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
By JOHN CRUDELE--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------March 29, 2005 -- THE Bush Administration proudly boasts that
2.2 million new jobs were created last year. But a tally of the 50
states comes up with a number that's 340,000 jobs shy of that
figure. Worse, even the lower state number is probably
unrealistically high. The number of jobs that were really created
last year is anyone's guess. And until there's an in-depth study
years from now, the true figure probably won't be known.But according to figures that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
pulls together through estimates based on its surveys — which is
like guesses based on guesses — there were 132.58 million jobs in
this country last year, up from 130.37 million in 2003.In case you don't have a calculator handy that's a gain of 2.21
million.But according to the numbers provided by the states, there were
132.11 million jobs in the country in 2004, up from 130.24 million
at the start of the previous year. That's a gain of only 1.87 million
jobs.The difference is 340,000 jobs, which is 15 percent below the
official boast number.Here's the funny part — at least it is funny if you aren't somebody
looking for work. Both of those numbers - the 2.21 million job
gain and the slimmer 1.87 million increase — are official U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics tallies. And if you look at the BLS Web
site (http://www.bls.gov) you'll see both of these figures presented just a
click away from each other.The not-so-funny part is that the smaller job tally for the 50 states
is probably too optimistic.As I recently reported in this column, New Jersey said it had
recounted job growth and decided that only 46,300 new positions
opened up in the Garden State last year and not the 75,900 jobs it
originally thought. That's
40 percent below the first guess.For the record, Washington thinks New Jersey had 50,300 new jobs
last year — no doubt gleaned from some formula as secret as
Colonel Sanders' chicken recipe.If all the other states trim job growth by the same amount as New
Jersey (and I'm not saying they'll have to) that would mean the
number of new positions was just 1.41 million.I've saved these figures for this week on purpose. On Friday the
government will announce the number of new jobs it thinks were
created in March.Folks, let me emphasize this: Washington is guessing at this
number and it has very little relationship to the job market.Even so, the financial markets will move sharply based on Friday's
figure.So hold onto your hats if you are anticipating the need to borrow
money, or if you are investing in stocks or bonds.Here's how the situation looks.Wall Street is expecting job growth of 225,000 jobs and it thinks
the unemployment rate will fall to 5.3 percent from 5.4 percent last
month. Forget the rate of unemployment — it doesn't matter.The key Friday is job growth. And that will depend on a little known
— except to my readers — assumption that the government makes
for jobs it thinks, but can't prove, are being created by newly
formed companies.The BLS calls this its Birth/Death ratio, in case you want to look it
up.March 2005's birth/death assumption should be larger than last
year's 153,000, and these assumptions should get monstrously
large in the April report and remain high during May and June.As with last month's employment figure — the February figures
that were announced in March — this assumption could cause
Friday's job growth to exceed expectations.What does that do to the financial markets?If the number announced Friday is, as I expect, stronger than Wall
Street expects, interest rates will jump sharply.And while stocks might initially applaud a stronger job gain
investors will ultimately realize that higher interest rates aren't
good for corporate profits. Stocks will then retreat.So if you are just an ordinary person looking to find out what's
happening in the job market, you've learned the government has a
tendency to sugarcoat the job picture.But if you are an investor take this away with you: Friday's number
could make your life a lot harder.[email protected]Montag
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
By JOHN CRUDELE--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------March 29, 2005 -- THE Bush Administration proudly boasts that
2.2 million new jobs were created last year. But a tally of the 50
states comes up with a number that's 340,000 jobs shy of that
figure. Worse, even the lower state number is probably
unrealistically high. The number of jobs that were really created
last year is anyone's guess. And until there's an in-depth study
years from now, the true figure probably won't be known.But according to figures that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
pulls together through estimates based on its surveys — which is
like guesses based on guesses — there were 132.58 million jobs in
this country last year, up from 130.37 million in 2003.In case you don't have a calculator handy that's a gain of 2.21
million.But according to the numbers provided by the states, there were
132.11 million jobs in the country in 2004, up from 130.24 million
at the start of the previous year. That's a gain of only 1.87 million
jobs.The difference is 340,000 jobs, which is 15 percent below the
official boast number.Here's the funny part — at least it is funny if you aren't somebody
looking for work. Both of those numbers - the 2.21 million job
gain and the slimmer 1.87 million increase — are official U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics tallies. And if you look at the BLS Web
site (http://www.bls.gov) you'll see both of these figures presented just a
click away from each other.The not-so-funny part is that the smaller job tally for the 50 states
is probably too optimistic.As I recently reported in this column, New Jersey said it had
recounted job growth and decided that only 46,300 new positions
opened up in the Garden State last year and not the 75,900 jobs it
originally thought. That's
40 percent below the first guess.For the record, Washington thinks New Jersey had 50,300 new jobs
last year — no doubt gleaned from some formula as secret as
Colonel Sanders' chicken recipe.If all the other states trim job growth by the same amount as New
Jersey (and I'm not saying they'll have to) that would mean the
number of new positions was just 1.41 million.I've saved these figures for this week on purpose. On Friday the
government will announce the number of new jobs it thinks were
created in March.Folks, let me emphasize this: Washington is guessing at this
number and it has very little relationship to the job market.Even so, the financial markets will move sharply based on Friday's
figure.So hold onto your hats if you are anticipating the need to borrow
money, or if you are investing in stocks or bonds.Here's how the situation looks.Wall Street is expecting job growth of 225,000 jobs and it thinks
the unemployment rate will fall to 5.3 percent from 5.4 percent last
month. Forget the rate of unemployment — it doesn't matter.The key Friday is job growth. And that will depend on a little known
— except to my readers — assumption that the government makes
for jobs it thinks, but can't prove, are being created by newly
formed companies.The BLS calls this its Birth/Death ratio, in case you want to look it
up.March 2005's birth/death assumption should be larger than last
year's 153,000, and these assumptions should get monstrously
large in the April report and remain high during May and June.As with last month's employment figure — the February figures
that were announced in March — this assumption could cause
Friday's job growth to exceed expectations.What does that do to the financial markets?If the number announced Friday is, as I expect, stronger than Wall
Street expects, interest rates will jump sharply.And while stocks might initially applaud a stronger job gain
investors will ultimately realize that higher interest rates aren't
good for corporate profits. Stocks will then retreat.So if you are just an ordinary person looking to find out what's
happening in the job market, you've learned the government has a
tendency to sugarcoat the job picture.But if you are an investor take this away with you: Friday's number
could make your life a lot harder.[email protected]Montag
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
