IC=Integrated Circuit   (which is where the real code should reside...far more tamper proof)

I'm not saying that electronic voting machines can't be hacked, and Diebold's seem to be some of the most vulnerable IMO. But contrary to what the Princeton study would have us believe, it would take a massive conspiracy in the month leading up to the elections to pull it off on any grand scale.  Each and every district (and the machines in each one) are programmed with different scenarios (candidates).  And you'd have to pay off a hell of a lot of true experts to do it. 

So, if the GOP can pull something like that off, why can't the left hire the counter measure people to ward them off or at the very least, detect and prove their deceit?