There is absolutely nothing to this story. U.S. Attorneys are political appointees...they serve at the pleasure of the president. Why they were fired, how they were fired, who fired them...what they were fired for.. none of it matters. Just like cabinet secretaries, the president can fire them all whenever he wants. There is no explanation needed. There is no controversy here. This is all just an invented scandal by the media and the left. Some spineless "Republicans" are actually going along with it. Calling on the Attorney General to resign? What for? Doing his job? There are already some media outlets comparing this non-scandal to Watergate. How? In what way? When you serve at the pleasure of the president, you can be fired at anytime for any reason. The president exercised his prerogative ... and some U.S. Attorneys were fired. The Dems know, however, that they can make this into a major scandal because they have a media establishment that is not only willing, but positively eager to help them out.
D
dale
(view)
There is absolutely nothing to this story. U.S. Attorneys are political appointees...they serve at the pleasure of the president. Why they were fired, how they were fired, who fired them...what they were fired for.. none of it matters. Just like cabinet secretaries, the president can fire them all whenever he wants. There is no explanation needed. There is no controversy here. This is all just an invented scandal by the media and the left. Some spineless "Republicans" are actually going along with it. Calling on the Attorney General to resign? What for? Doing his job? There are already some media outlets comparing this non-scandal to Watergate. How? In what way? When you serve at the pleasure of the president, you can be fired at anytime for any reason. The president exercised his prerogative ... and some U.S. Attorneys were fired. The Dems know, however, that they can make this into a major scandal because they have a media establishment that is not only willing, but positively eager to help them out.
posted 2007.03.16
posted on March 16th 2007
-
Not For You, Grillboy – Baerwald on March 15th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – messybear on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – cassandra on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Baerwald on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – dale on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – messybear on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – MJG on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – dale on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Marc on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Marc on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Baerwald on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – dale on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Baerwald on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – dale on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – Baerwald on March 16th, 2007-
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – dale on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – MJG on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – edlorah on March 16th, 2007
Re: Not For You, Grillboy – messybear on March 16th, 2007
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
