Icon Re: Cindy McCain weighs in... • [Uh-duh-duh-duh-dendum]
M
messybear (view)

In a world chock-full of exceptional, benevolent and well-informed (and noble-hearted) examples of matriarchal womanhood, …all that seems to be floating to the most eminent regions of neo-conservative pundit & gov'ment are ditzes, bimbos & none too subtle buxom barbarians of the Anointed Board of Forgotten Beatitudes & Augury Assurances.  Only in a been-around world dominated by a species whose Alpha P & D fear (loath, dominate) the [womb/vagina] able influence of women, would such examples of female mediocrity be deemed leadership worthy.

 

…anyway, it seems that way to me.  I could be swayed otherwise, but the evidence resounds/reverberates. 

 

 

“One of the problems that engaged Aldous Huxley throughout his life was that of overpopulation. He wrote, lectured, and collaborated on film projects to try to move the world to deal with the issue. In his view, the issue was not simply overpopulation, but that inferior people were overpopulating.”

from the Introduction of Readings on Brave New World, The Greenhaven Press Literary Companion to British Literature

 

 

at times I feel like a dreamstate John the Savage ~~ banish me to some redundant island

 soon; I’ve seen what the rope and the rafters wish of me and it’s not my bag, Mustapha. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p.s.

 

If ye cannot parody the times, Pan-the-man, then we don’see the enormity.  & th thing is I

..still wana blieve we’re still on the bright track to luminosity as 2big-4-our-britches beings

 

–--
intellectually masturbatin while the radio was playin
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts