Dave Tahija
location: Butte, Montana, en route from San Francisco to Juneau
listening to: Train - Save me, San Francisco
registered: 1999.12.27
posts: 261
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Thank you Reg and heathcliffe for your kind words. These are pretty simple calculations any bright high-schooler could do but I'll take all the praise I can get.
It turns out that Kevin Costner has been bankrolling development of an oil/water separation system which might be used for a piece of the cleanup. His device uses a centrifuge rather than membranes but the result is much the same. Costner claims an effectiveness of 97% in this article:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0520/Kevin-Costner-oil-spill-cleanup-idea-interests-BP
His business partner claims an effectiveness of 99% on page 2 of this one:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/21/nation/la-na-oil-spill-hollywood-20100521
The downside is that the largest of his machines can only treat 200 gpm and only twenty of them exist. It might be possible to protect a limited bit of coastline with these but they're far from being a large scale solution.
By the way, centrifuges are an even more proven technology than membranes for this sort of thing. They've been used for a very long time to separate oily butterfat from watery skim milk in dairy cream separators. Grandma's version was hand cranked and modern ones are powered by electric motors but the principle is the same.
D
Dave Tahija
(view)
Thank you Reg and heathcliffe for your kind words. These are pretty simple calculations any bright high-schooler could do but I'll take all the praise I can get.
It turns out that Kevin Costner has been bankrolling development of an oil/water separation system which might be used for a piece of the cleanup. His device uses a centrifuge rather than membranes but the result is much the same. Costner claims an effectiveness of 97% in this article:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0520/Kevin-Costner-oil-spill-cleanup-idea-interests-BP
His business partner claims an effectiveness of 99% on page 2 of this one:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/21/nation/la-na-oil-spill-hollywood-20100521
The downside is that the largest of his machines can only treat 200 gpm and only twenty of them exist. It might be possible to protect a limited bit of coastline with these but they're far from being a large scale solution.
By the way, centrifuges are an even more proven technology than membranes for this sort of thing. They've been used for a very long time to separate oily butterfat from watery skim milk in dairy cream separators. Grandma's version was hand cranked and modern ones are powered by electric motors but the principle is the same.
posted 2010.05.23
posted on May 23rd 2010
D
Dave Tahija
location: Butte, Montana, en route from San Francisco to Juneau
listening to: Train - Save me, San Francisco
registered: 1999.12.27
posts: 261
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
In Gulf Spill, BP Using Dispersants Banned in U.K. – cassandra on May 19th, 2010-
Re: In Gulf Spill, BP Using Dispersants Banned in U.K. – rosskolnikov on May 20th, 2010-
Re: In Gulf Spill, BP Using Dispersants Banned in U.K. – Andrea on May 20th, 2010
-
-
