The 1st article had very democratic slanted overtones to it. Kind of a misleading header on it

The 2nd article appeared to be a little more objective when stating that Arnold had been "tempered" by the Kennedys to more of a moderate.
I would say this one was more true to form of the two.

Why would Arnold run would be the definitive question here.
And the answer is not to save the state of California from ruin :)