I apologize for saying in my last post that your argument is not based on logic. It is. It's based on a logic to fit your narrative. If Bill gets impeached it's because the republicans despise him. If Hillary wins it's because the republicans are helping. But if she loses vis-a-vis an indictment it's because of republicans orchestrating her downfall. Or Obama won because the establishment backed him although Hillary and Bill are the establishment. My head is spinning from the contortions.

The thing is Reg (and Messy you muppet) - is I don't necessarily disagree with the fact that Bill and Hillary have amassed considerable power within the democratic establishment and are wielding it gloriously in this primary season. What I don't agree with (and frankly consider in the bin of conspiracy) is this grand scheme you envision of a lust for power and greed foisting Hillary upon us. Reg - she's overwhelmingly winning the popular vote among registered democrats. And what you call a seemingly sure bet being postponed by Sanders - I see as the democratic process. He's no sacrificial lamb lying down. He's fighting - winning some and losing more. But that's what's supposed to happen. In the end Reg - she's winning and he's not. And that ain't no conspiracy.