Re: A distinction for thought - First Amendment vs Second Amendment
Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
In the aftermath of the civil war, US guns were initially instituted in order to restrict blacks from the ability to protect themselves.
An interesting prospective of DBs reference is that until the Black Panther incidents in California, it was perfectly legal to carry a firearm into a court house. Too, chances are the FBI setup the Panthers using paid informants, i.e., creating a premeditated event.
cheers
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
In the aftermath of the civil war, US guns were initially instituted in order to restrict blacks from the ability to protect themselves.
An interesting prospective of DBs reference is that until the Black Panther incidents in California, it was perfectly legal to carry a firearm into a court house. Too, chances are the FBI setup the Panthers using paid informants, i.e., creating a premeditated event.
cheers
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
[
login] |
[
register]
you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts