"Firstly, whenever the right criticizes a mindless Hollywood type for making anti Bush comments the left screams `first ammendment rights`. Why are these comments held to a higher standard?"
It will never cease to amaze me that almost anything you discuss comes back at some point to celebrity gazing. I think the only thing more bizarre is your mindless partisanship. I'm not speaking for John Kerry here but the thing is if some jackass wants to sell these shirts you are absolutely correct he should be allowed to. The issue here is not the shirts themselves it's the venue at which they were being offered for sale. On top of which the outright lie that they didn't know what was going on. Looking at that idea any Islamic terrorist orginization could have bought a table and sold their wares at the convention because "Well, we just couldn't keep track of 50 vendors."
If these guys don't want to be known as liars they shouldn't lie so much. That's simple enough for even you to understand isn't it Rich?
(I understand why people disagree with them but *why* are their different rules when it comes to the first ammendment)
No offense Rich, but I'm beginning to wonder what you understand at all. There are not different rules being applied here as much as you'd like to insinuate that idea. The fact is, just like Dale said it's probably a good idea that Dean not hire Franken as a mouthpiece, it's a pretty damn good idea that your party of choice not promote such stupidity.
"Secondly, where are the factual errors in the anti-Clinton and anti-Muslim slogans?"
Wow, Rich! You really want to show off how unplugged you are here huh? My God man, it's starting to look like someone rolled over a rock and out you popped. I believe any thinking conservative would prefer to distance himself from you a.s.a.p. because really man, you've lost it! Where are the factual errors? Well, if you want to promote the idea that all Musilms are terrorists then because we've got a load of Catholic preists that have raped children that means that all Catholics must be child rapists! Or at least we should suspect them all right? Hi Rich, this is planet earth...please stop circling the rings of Uranus.
"For PC-partisans I know they're blasphemy regardless, but have we missed something when it's been established that a) Clinton was weak on defense (WTC 1, Mogadishu, USS Cole, African Embassy attacks etc.)"
Well, this has got to go down as the dumbest hog twaddle I've ever read Rich. By this logic Bush would be the weakest on defense in our history because 9/11 happened on his watch. And before your panties get all in a bunch Richie, I'm not blaming Bush for 9/11, he probably wishes he were on vacation in September rather than August at this point. But if I did blame Bush it would make at least slightly more sense than you blaming Clinton...and really that's not saying a thing. I guess you've chosen to play left field for the conservatives. How's the weather out there?
