: On the other hand, as my friend and tormentor Dan Schwartz has pointed out, "Fifth Beatle" verges on sacrilege.
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
Dan
location: WV➔VA➔FL➔WV➔OH
listening to: so many intros
registered: 1997.08.29
posts: 2698
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
–--
Now your patrons have all left you in the red. Your low rent friends are dead. This life can be very strange.
Now your patrons have all left you in the red. Your low rent friends are dead. This life can be very strange.
Dan
(view)
: On the other hand, as my friend and tormentor Dan Schwartz has pointed out, "Fifth Beatle" verges on sacrilege.
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
I agree totally %100 without a doubt for sure. I had reservations about using that term (the 5th Beatle) as I usually cringe at just about ANYONE covering Beatles songs. I think Beatle songs should stay on Beatle records.
Dan
–--
Now your patrons have all left you in the red. Your low rent friends are dead. This life can be very strange.
Now your patrons have all left you in the red. Your low rent friends are dead. This life can be very strange.
