>>By the way Kevin G or Richard go easy on me...don't >>make it too personal...
I wasn't going to say anything. You managed to state your case without sounding hysterical or taking a snide swipe at me, so I'm ok. You're right when it comes to the Israeli's reaping a whirlwind over the next days, but then if the Islamofascist dogs want a war, then Sharon is the one to give it to them. One of the articles I posted for KD touches on this.
They ought to remember that if they want peace, they best start talking to Sharon's admin. If he goes for any reason, Bibi Netanyahu is waiting in the wings ready to kick some serious ass without giving any quarter to any of the Muslims in the Middle East.
Now what would be *really* interesting is this, if there's another major terrorist attack on the west, would this current shower of do-nothing liberals still be wailing over the office of 'Homeland Security' and such? Or might they wake up to the fact that these radicals need a little discipline? To misquote Chris Hitchens, these same liberals squealed loudly before anything actually happened and now they're deaf to the cries of those in real distress (such as the Israeli's... such as the Christians who were martyred in Pakistan... such as the missionary victims of Abu Sayef)
No surrender...in the spirit of Ben-Guiron,
Richard
Re: by the way
R
richard
(view)
>>By the way Kevin G or Richard go easy on me...don't >>make it too personal...
I wasn't going to say anything. You managed to state your case without sounding hysterical or taking a snide swipe at me, so I'm ok. You're right when it comes to the Israeli's reaping a whirlwind over the next days, but then if the Islamofascist dogs want a war, then Sharon is the one to give it to them. One of the articles I posted for KD touches on this.
They ought to remember that if they want peace, they best start talking to Sharon's admin. If he goes for any reason, Bibi Netanyahu is waiting in the wings ready to kick some serious ass without giving any quarter to any of the Muslims in the Middle East.
Now what would be *really* interesting is this, if there's another major terrorist attack on the west, would this current shower of do-nothing liberals still be wailing over the office of 'Homeland Security' and such? Or might they wake up to the fact that these radicals need a little discipline? To misquote Chris Hitchens, these same liberals squealed loudly before anything actually happened and now they're deaf to the cries of those in real distress (such as the Israeli's... such as the Christians who were martyred in Pakistan... such as the missionary victims of Abu Sayef)
No surrender...in the spirit of Ben-Guiron,
Richard
I wasn't going to say anything. You managed to state your case without sounding hysterical or taking a snide swipe at me, so I'm ok. You're right when it comes to the Israeli's reaping a whirlwind over the next days, but then if the Islamofascist dogs want a war, then Sharon is the one to give it to them. One of the articles I posted for KD touches on this.
They ought to remember that if they want peace, they best start talking to Sharon's admin. If he goes for any reason, Bibi Netanyahu is waiting in the wings ready to kick some serious ass without giving any quarter to any of the Muslims in the Middle East.
Now what would be *really* interesting is this, if there's another major terrorist attack on the west, would this current shower of do-nothing liberals still be wailing over the office of 'Homeland Security' and such? Or might they wake up to the fact that these radicals need a little discipline? To misquote Chris Hitchens, these same liberals squealed loudly before anything actually happened and now they're deaf to the cries of those in real distress (such as the Israeli's... such as the Christians who were martyred in Pakistan... such as the missionary victims of Abu Sayef)
No surrender...in the spirit of Ben-Guiron,
Richard
