Icon For Dan - Some words about PROOF
K
KentDB741 (view)

Dan:

While reading the new book TALES FROM THE TIME LOOP --- I thought of only you when I read the following passage which appeared on pgs. 344-345.

The title of this chapter is: OK, PROVE IT!

Here is the excerpt:

"It's funny how the public and media are quite willing to accept lies pedalled by the politicians without any demand for 'proof' and yet they insist on proof from anyone challenging the official version of reality. The official 'truth' of September 11th is one such case. A schoolboy could take the story apart. But when faced with other explanations for these events, and for life itself, the same people who accept this crap without question scream: "Where's the proof?"

"That's all very well, mate, but how can you convince me if you don't have the evidence to prove it? I can't believe what hasn't been proved, can I?"

Oh, but people do; and they go on doing so their whole lives. Some points to make here. First, why can't we 'feel' and 'know' our reality instead of insisting that the conditioned and manipulated mind must be the only arbiter of 'truth' through the production of evidence that it believes to be 'proof?'

What is 'proof' anyway? Proof is only that which the conditioned mind accepts to be so. Billions are convinced that the official version of 9/11 is true because of the 'proof' revealed by the United States government. After all, didn't they find a passport from one of the hijackers that had miraculously survived the fireball to be found in the street? Well, actually, no they didn't because it was a lie.

But the FBI named the 19 hijackers didn't they? No, they gave us 19 names, at least seven of which were found to still be alive. But they proved Bin Laden did it, surely? I heard them say that. Yes exactly, we heard them say it and nothing more. They produced no 'proof' of anything, only the repetition of the their fairy tale that billions accepted as 'proof.'

It was those using their 'hearts,' their intuition, who knew something was very wrong with the official version even before any further investigation had begun. Does what I reported in the last chapter 'feel' right intuitively even without 'scientific' support? Only you know if it feels right to you or not; you don't need some guy with a fancy title and letters after his name to tell you what to think.

What does your heart say? That's all that matters.

Second, the last thing I am trying to do is convince anyone of anything, that's not my intention or desire at all. So why bother doing what I do? I want to understand what is going on and I believe it is right that evryone should have access to all information available and not just the version that suits those in power. What people make of it is their business, not mine.

Third, even for those who still demand 'proof' for everything, there is an increasingly enormous amount of scientific support for the themes of the last chapter, fantastic as it may have appeared to be at first reading."

--- David Icke, TALES FROM THE TIME LOOP, pgs. 344-345

NOTE: The information that Mr. Icke refers to in "the last chapter" deals with the true nature of reality. This coincidentally matched perfectly with what I was told on May 5, 1980. Since there were members of my family there --- they heard the account of my experience immediately after I came back from the "other side."

KDB = Buffalo, NY USA
[login] | [register]

you need to be logged in to post and reply to message board posts