>How about dissecting what he had to say and >attacking him on those grounds, rather than >desperately grasping at things that have little to do >with the subject at hand?
Here, here !
This speech is well thought out and addresses the crux of concerns that need to be considered before we rush to such a critical decision.
It amazes me that someone would take the time to research this man's history in search of petty name calling opportunities and not even take the time to consider what he had to say in this speech.
Try reading the speech and pretend you don't know the author.
