EEE
location: Landscape Challenged Illinois
listening to: 16 Horsepower, black music from the 70's & and still going broke from Paste Magazine
registered: 2002.08.26
posts: 3227
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
There are a couple of great sites out there for politics.....Campaigndesk.org
Spinsanity.comCampaigndesk.org is put out by the Columbia School of Journalism and Spinsanity.com is
a site that cuts through the spin on both sides.I have just finished a book titled "Weapons of Mass Deception" and would suggest it to
others. As the title suggests, this is a book against the Iraq war, but is more than that. It
discusses everything from the process of changing the American mind for war to the
purchasing of an SUV and how a lot of this is all related.One of the greatest shames, in my opinion, is the hiring of Madison Avenue PR firms and
individuals to persuade the American mind to the views of the government. For example,
former Assistant Secretary of Defense Torrie Clark used to work for a huge PR firm. She
was hired and came up with the system of "embedded news reporters" during the Iraq
war. Now, on its face, this could have been a wonderful thing for information
dissemination, however, at the hands of the Dept of Defense it turned out to very little
more than a tactic for propaganda dissemination. The authors of this book show this by
pointing out that reporters were told where to go, what to report on, what they couldn't
report on, who they could interview, who they couldn't interview and when they could do
such things. The reporters also were mainly only allowed to interview soliders in front of
supervisors (for anyone who has not been in the military, very few soldiers will ever speak
freely in front of bosses - but as we saw, some brave soldiers did speak out, sadly, look
back to what happened next; they were sought out and disciplined in various ways). Now, don't get me wrong and think I am suggesting that reporters should be able to
disseminate EVERY thing they see immediately. Certainly a reporter should not report on
things such as troop movements or other information that would put our soldiers in harm,
however, a reporter should be able to report on the things such as Iraqi citizen casulties
and injuries.But what is shameful, is how the PR firm mission is that of changing the American mind,
rather than informing the American mind. Sure, some will say this is naive to be concerned
about, or choose to ignore such a process, but when you do, sit back and think of all your
favorite songs and the images that they now first invoke in your mind - Does Bob Seger's
"Like A Rock" bring up an image of a shiney new Chevy? Does the Beatles' "Revolution"
bring up images of tennis shoes? Do many songs from the 68 era invoke images of war or
hippy themed images from nostalgic styled movies and tv shows?We truly have become a captive audience that gladly eats up any spoon fed shit our
government continues to feed us.....and the saddest thing is that our government realizes
this while most of us do not and takes particular glee that we even smile while heartily
chowing down......
Eric
E
EEE
(view)
There are a couple of great sites out there for politics.....Campaigndesk.org
Spinsanity.comCampaigndesk.org is put out by the Columbia School of Journalism and Spinsanity.com is
a site that cuts through the spin on both sides.I have just finished a book titled "Weapons of Mass Deception" and would suggest it to
others. As the title suggests, this is a book against the Iraq war, but is more than that. It
discusses everything from the process of changing the American mind for war to the
purchasing of an SUV and how a lot of this is all related.One of the greatest shames, in my opinion, is the hiring of Madison Avenue PR firms and
individuals to persuade the American mind to the views of the government. For example,
former Assistant Secretary of Defense Torrie Clark used to work for a huge PR firm. She
was hired and came up with the system of "embedded news reporters" during the Iraq
war. Now, on its face, this could have been a wonderful thing for information
dissemination, however, at the hands of the Dept of Defense it turned out to very little
more than a tactic for propaganda dissemination. The authors of this book show this by
pointing out that reporters were told where to go, what to report on, what they couldn't
report on, who they could interview, who they couldn't interview and when they could do
such things. The reporters also were mainly only allowed to interview soliders in front of
supervisors (for anyone who has not been in the military, very few soldiers will ever speak
freely in front of bosses - but as we saw, some brave soldiers did speak out, sadly, look
back to what happened next; they were sought out and disciplined in various ways). Now, don't get me wrong and think I am suggesting that reporters should be able to
disseminate EVERY thing they see immediately. Certainly a reporter should not report on
things such as troop movements or other information that would put our soldiers in harm,
however, a reporter should be able to report on the things such as Iraqi citizen casulties
and injuries.But what is shameful, is how the PR firm mission is that of changing the American mind,
rather than informing the American mind. Sure, some will say this is naive to be concerned
about, or choose to ignore such a process, but when you do, sit back and think of all your
favorite songs and the images that they now first invoke in your mind - Does Bob Seger's
"Like A Rock" bring up an image of a shiney new Chevy? Does the Beatles' "Revolution"
bring up images of tennis shoes? Do many songs from the 68 era invoke images of war or
hippy themed images from nostalgic styled movies and tv shows?We truly have become a captive audience that gladly eats up any spoon fed shit our
government continues to feed us.....and the saddest thing is that our government realizes
this while most of us do not and takes particular glee that we even smile while heartily
chowing down......
Eric
