I perused a few sections, and there are some intriguing ideas presented. There were clearly some inexplicable things going on, and some of the "coincidences" are just too bizarre to think there wasn't at least a little scheming going on. But it seems like oversimplification to put so much credence on the analysis of the specific timelines. How accurate are individuals estimates of time in moments of extreme excitement?  

It would really help the credibility of the whole thing if the person conducting the interview didn't sound like a total crony. What's more, with all the (laughter) and stroking going on, it took on the ambiance of a sophomoric radio program ala Bob and Tom.

To take it in it's entirety is just way too launched, and is the reason that most will be so quickly dismissive. Why not just focus on a few key discrepancies, rather spinning this incredibly intricate web?