judgement, but I am not allowed to praise your post because I speak to what the Almight had written down and has seen fit to preserve.

Hmmm....

I find your response hostile and indisputeably intolerant. Which is fine by me, you being open minded unlike myself. Apparently where people of my orientation are concerned, you find the Bill of Rights objectionable.

The irony is that I am not in the least dangerous to you, or anyone who believes like you. Except in your mind of course.

Additionally, if I was in charge of the education system, your child/ren would get a well rounded classical liberal education. Which would include literacy in mathematics, composition, literature, american/international history, self defense, the arts, along with the various origin theories. I'd give 'em plenty to think about, so they'd be encouraged and might learn to.

BTW, a theory is not an indisputable fact; regardless of which side of the aisle one is on. Further, once one states or infers, a known theory is a fact, that individuals' belief system becomes faith based: meaning that that individual is either intellectually dishonest or honestly practicing their religious faith(when they treat theory as fact). Which would be you be doing?

Be well,

PS Nonetheless, I liked the it's/its poem/reminder or whatever such a learning aid is properly called.

To show you just how human I am, my first reaction was to tell you to, 'piss off!?!'.

GM(mm;)

PSS As to Pharisees:

Ac 23:6* But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Brethren, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees: touching the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. : 7* And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees and Sadducees; and the assembly was divided. :8* For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit; but the Pharisees confess both.