Well, I just read the first 22 pages before realizing I probably should do something for my paycheck. On second thoughts, maybe I'll just take the rest of the afternoon off.

Kent has once again shown some brilliant insight. And once again he has also lost focus on the topic by resorting to labels such as the "Bush Crime Family". I don't dispute that it's an accurate and well-deserved moniker, but rather am disappointed because of the impact of reading those things - particularly when trying to persuade skeptics.

One thing I would like to review is the data used for the stock price analysis amongst industry leaders in different sectors. Of particular interest would be to know how many of those stocks split during the period. 

Thanks for posting it, Andrea!