You are now stating opinion not fact. The fact is these judges, as I already stated, were sold by Republican presidents and administrations to other Republicans as "true conservatives." So, are they really liberal or are they moderates you'd prefer to move further to the right?
Reg whoever put them there the point is moot. Maybe they were conservative at the time or acted like it or professed to be or were recognized as such or seemed to be or made statements as........
There is no gray area on they're voting records so I am not acting on opinion. I am operating from fact

Be careful what you wish for...the Kelo decision in the court won because it benefits the "majority" more than the individual or "minority"...you seem to have been fooled into joining the argument that "majority" comes before "minority" in a democracy and so in that regard if you chase the ideas you seem to espouse then the Kelo decision meets your ideals. This is why careful consideration is due, not based on your faith and religious beliefs, but on how this effects government decisions in the future...once a precedent is set it can be used in other circumstances...so personal views need to be set aside and the true weight of the action needs to be considered. You could win an overturn of Roe v. Wade and be drinking your bubbly to celebrate and while you are the precedent that had been set is being turned against you. The issue is not as simple as "let's save babies" and you have to come to terms with that. In the Kelo case what's good for the "majority" won and you don't like it...you have not considered that it seems...
This is such psychobabble nonsense and you know it. You want to put this to a vote and see what the majority want. I would bet 75 to 80 % of the people would be against it. Why Bush and Co. were mum on the issue dissapoints me

So, I am clearly on your side, Pat...the question really becomes are you on mine?
No were on not on the same sides there Reg. So the answer is no