Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
July 7, 2006Cindy Sheehan Gets Hardballed Cindy Sheehan was certainly not treated with any reverence on
her July 5th appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
Norah O'Donnell filled in for Matthews and conducted a
surprisingly good interview. Here is the transcript with some
additional comments.O'DONNELL: Cindy Sheehan is America's most outspoken anti-
war activist. But does she speak for America, or just the
fringes? She's called President Bush "the biggest terrorist in
the world," and she stood side-by-side with socialist dictator
Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Now, she begins a two-month
hunger strike to get the American people to join her mission
to end the war. Welcome to HARDBALL, Cindy. Let me begin
by asking you, you know, Americans may hate the war, but
they don't necessarily hate the president. How do you expect
to get change by going around the world and trashing the
president of the United States?CINDY SHEEHAN: Actually, I don't hate the president, either.
And I don't trash the president; I trash the president's foreign
policy, which is fundamentally and inherently wrong and
immoral. And I don't tell people around the world anything
that they don't know.O'DONNELL: But you called him "the biggest terrorist in the
world." So you are trashing the president.SHEEHAN: Well, you know, he says a terrorist is somebody
who kills innocent men, women and children, and there have
been over 100,000 innocent men, women and children killed
in Iraq on his orders. (What a crock!)O'DONNELL: Cindy, you have just begun a two-month hunger
strike. Isn't this really just more of a publicity stunt? (YES!)SHEEHAN: No, actually it's not. It's a moral reaction to an
immoral war. Thousands of people all over the world are
joining us. And hunger strikes have proven to be effective
tools in civil disobedience and changing policy.O'DONNELL: But do you honestly expect Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld or the president of the United States to say,
Cindy Sheehan is going on a hunger strike and so I'm going to
end this war?SHEEHAN: Well, that would be nice, but what we're trying to
do is also awaken consciousness in the United States and
around the world to get more people out and active, because
we know two-thirds of America disapprove of George Bush
and his policies in Iraq, but I don't see two-thirds of America
out protesting, writing their congresspeople and changing
policy.O'DONNELL: And nor, quite frankly, do you see members of
Congress—and you claim to not be in the fringes, to not be an
extremist, and yet what members of Congress support you in
your policy?SHEEHAN: Well, really on both sides of the aisle. We have Ron
Paul and Walter Jones, who are Republicans who are
outspoken critics of George Bush's policies. We have many on
the other sides, just as John Conyers, Charlie Rangel. ( Now
these are some stellar examples)O'DONNELL: And in the Senate?SHEEHAN: In the Senate, well we would have many supporters
in the Senate too.O'DONNELL: Who? Who?SHEEHAN: John Kerry.O'DONNELL: John Kerry supports an immediate withdrawal
from Iraq. Did he tell you that?SHEEHAN: His office is working on starting a withdrawal as
soon as possible to have the troops home by the end of the
year. He has—I have talked to his office about that, and that's
something he's trying to push in the Senate.O'DONNELL: Well, in fact, the bill that Senator Kerry has
proposed went down in flames in the Senate. (OUCH!)SHEEHAN: Yes, it did but, you know, only—you know, in
Vietnam, there was only a few senators at first, and then it
turned around. (There was also the liberal media)O'DONNELL: Let me challenge you on this, Cindy, because
what you're calling for is, in fact, an extreme position,
because there are very few members of Congress who support
immediate withdrawal. You would, if you could, fly a bunch of
planes over there, pick up all our troops and take them home
tomorrow, if you could, if it was in your power. There is no
one in the United States Congress, Democrat, Republican or
Independent who would do that.SHEEHAN: Actually, there are many members. There's an "Out
of Iraq" Congress that has 70 members that are calling for an
immediate withdrawal. And we can't fly planes over and pick
them all up tomorrow.O'DONNELL: Right.SHEEHAN: You know, it would take a few months, and it has to
be safe for our soldiers and as safe for the Iraqi people as
possible, but it has to be as soon as possible.O'DONNELL: You speak very passionately about your cause.
You lost a son in Iraq. We honor his service and sacrifice. But
you've been traveling the world—Scotland, Spain, Venezuela,
Ireland, Australia, Austria—how does that help the cause
when, again, you're around the world trashing the president,
calling him a terrorist, calling him worse than Osama bin
Laden. How do you honestly expect to affect change with
those types of remarks?SHEEHAN: Well, it's really important too that the people in the
world know that there are Americans on their side, because as
anti-Bush sentiment goes up in the world, anti-American
sentiment goes up also. And people—I've had hundreds of
people around the world tell me before you, we thought all
Americans supported George Bush. And it's important for us,
people of different countries in different borders, to reach out
to one another to work to force our leaders to solve problems
peacefully. And this is really important.O'DONNELL: But why go stand side-by-side by Hugo Chavez
in Venezuela? Why do that? I mean, it sounds like—would you
rather live under Hugo Chavez than George Bush?SHEEHAN: Yes. You know, Hugo Chavez is not a dictator like
you introduced him. He's been democratically elected eight
times, and he's not anti-American. (And who cares if he is a
communist and his biggest pal is Fidel Castro?)O'DONNELL: Saddam Hussein was democratically elected.SHEEHAN: Yes, hold on a second. He is not anti-American. He
has helped the poor people of America. He has sent aid to
New Orleans. He has sold heating oil to disadvantaged people
in America, in the United States of America at low cost, and he
—the people of his country love him, and for us to say that we
have some kind of influence over Venezuelan policy is wrong.
The people of Venezuela have elected him overwhelmingly
eight times, and it's his country, and it's their country and
they should have the leader that they deserve, that they want.
(If the people of Venezuela were stupid enough to elect him
eight times, they surely deserve him)O'DONNELL: All right, Cindy Sheehan, thank you for joining
us.SHEEHAN: OK, thank you.Cindy was waiting for softballs, but got caught in her own
rhetoric. Let's call this one Cindy Sheehan exposed.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
July 7, 2006Cindy Sheehan Gets Hardballed Cindy Sheehan was certainly not treated with any reverence on
her July 5th appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
Norah O'Donnell filled in for Matthews and conducted a
surprisingly good interview. Here is the transcript with some
additional comments.O'DONNELL: Cindy Sheehan is America's most outspoken anti-
war activist. But does she speak for America, or just the
fringes? She's called President Bush "the biggest terrorist in
the world," and she stood side-by-side with socialist dictator
Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Now, she begins a two-month
hunger strike to get the American people to join her mission
to end the war. Welcome to HARDBALL, Cindy. Let me begin
by asking you, you know, Americans may hate the war, but
they don't necessarily hate the president. How do you expect
to get change by going around the world and trashing the
president of the United States?CINDY SHEEHAN: Actually, I don't hate the president, either.
And I don't trash the president; I trash the president's foreign
policy, which is fundamentally and inherently wrong and
immoral. And I don't tell people around the world anything
that they don't know.O'DONNELL: But you called him "the biggest terrorist in the
world." So you are trashing the president.SHEEHAN: Well, you know, he says a terrorist is somebody
who kills innocent men, women and children, and there have
been over 100,000 innocent men, women and children killed
in Iraq on his orders. (What a crock!)O'DONNELL: Cindy, you have just begun a two-month hunger
strike. Isn't this really just more of a publicity stunt? (YES!)SHEEHAN: No, actually it's not. It's a moral reaction to an
immoral war. Thousands of people all over the world are
joining us. And hunger strikes have proven to be effective
tools in civil disobedience and changing policy.O'DONNELL: But do you honestly expect Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld or the president of the United States to say,
Cindy Sheehan is going on a hunger strike and so I'm going to
end this war?SHEEHAN: Well, that would be nice, but what we're trying to
do is also awaken consciousness in the United States and
around the world to get more people out and active, because
we know two-thirds of America disapprove of George Bush
and his policies in Iraq, but I don't see two-thirds of America
out protesting, writing their congresspeople and changing
policy.O'DONNELL: And nor, quite frankly, do you see members of
Congress—and you claim to not be in the fringes, to not be an
extremist, and yet what members of Congress support you in
your policy?SHEEHAN: Well, really on both sides of the aisle. We have Ron
Paul and Walter Jones, who are Republicans who are
outspoken critics of George Bush's policies. We have many on
the other sides, just as John Conyers, Charlie Rangel. ( Now
these are some stellar examples)O'DONNELL: And in the Senate?SHEEHAN: In the Senate, well we would have many supporters
in the Senate too.O'DONNELL: Who? Who?SHEEHAN: John Kerry.O'DONNELL: John Kerry supports an immediate withdrawal
from Iraq. Did he tell you that?SHEEHAN: His office is working on starting a withdrawal as
soon as possible to have the troops home by the end of the
year. He has—I have talked to his office about that, and that's
something he's trying to push in the Senate.O'DONNELL: Well, in fact, the bill that Senator Kerry has
proposed went down in flames in the Senate. (OUCH!)SHEEHAN: Yes, it did but, you know, only—you know, in
Vietnam, there was only a few senators at first, and then it
turned around. (There was also the liberal media)O'DONNELL: Let me challenge you on this, Cindy, because
what you're calling for is, in fact, an extreme position,
because there are very few members of Congress who support
immediate withdrawal. You would, if you could, fly a bunch of
planes over there, pick up all our troops and take them home
tomorrow, if you could, if it was in your power. There is no
one in the United States Congress, Democrat, Republican or
Independent who would do that.SHEEHAN: Actually, there are many members. There's an "Out
of Iraq" Congress that has 70 members that are calling for an
immediate withdrawal. And we can't fly planes over and pick
them all up tomorrow.O'DONNELL: Right.SHEEHAN: You know, it would take a few months, and it has to
be safe for our soldiers and as safe for the Iraqi people as
possible, but it has to be as soon as possible.O'DONNELL: You speak very passionately about your cause.
You lost a son in Iraq. We honor his service and sacrifice. But
you've been traveling the world—Scotland, Spain, Venezuela,
Ireland, Australia, Austria—how does that help the cause
when, again, you're around the world trashing the president,
calling him a terrorist, calling him worse than Osama bin
Laden. How do you honestly expect to affect change with
those types of remarks?SHEEHAN: Well, it's really important too that the people in the
world know that there are Americans on their side, because as
anti-Bush sentiment goes up in the world, anti-American
sentiment goes up also. And people—I've had hundreds of
people around the world tell me before you, we thought all
Americans supported George Bush. And it's important for us,
people of different countries in different borders, to reach out
to one another to work to force our leaders to solve problems
peacefully. And this is really important.O'DONNELL: But why go stand side-by-side by Hugo Chavez
in Venezuela? Why do that? I mean, it sounds like—would you
rather live under Hugo Chavez than George Bush?SHEEHAN: Yes. You know, Hugo Chavez is not a dictator like
you introduced him. He's been democratically elected eight
times, and he's not anti-American. (And who cares if he is a
communist and his biggest pal is Fidel Castro?)O'DONNELL: Saddam Hussein was democratically elected.SHEEHAN: Yes, hold on a second. He is not anti-American. He
has helped the poor people of America. He has sent aid to
New Orleans. He has sold heating oil to disadvantaged people
in America, in the United States of America at low cost, and he
—the people of his country love him, and for us to say that we
have some kind of influence over Venezuelan policy is wrong.
The people of Venezuela have elected him overwhelmingly
eight times, and it's his country, and it's their country and
they should have the leader that they deserve, that they want.
(If the people of Venezuela were stupid enough to elect him
eight times, they surely deserve him)O'DONNELL: All right, Cindy Sheehan, thank you for joining
us.SHEEHAN: OK, thank you.Cindy was waiting for softballs, but got caught in her own
rhetoric. Let's call this one Cindy Sheehan exposed.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
