Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Quote of the Day:"The points that were put forth by the Americans were more abominable than the occupation."
-- Jalal al Din al-Saghir, leading lawmaker from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, responding to
U.S. requests for a treaty of permanent occupationSubject: Support an Iraqi referendum on the occupationHeadlines across America screamed the news this week. The U.S. government is seeking 58
permanent military bases in Iraq. Is this what you want? It certainly seems to NOT be what the Iraqi people want, given the violent
protests it has provoked.President Bush thinks U.S. military personnel should stay in Iraq for decades, the way they have in
Korea. John McCain says he's willing for U.S. troops to stay in Iraq for one hundred years, assuming,
he says, that there's no violence. But if Iraq becomes peaceful, why would U.S. forces even be
needed? Shouldn't we finally, at long last, ask the Iraqi people what they want? ABC News polled Iraqis in September of 2007. It found that 79% oppose the occupation, including
80% of Shiites, and 95% of Sunnis. Another poll conducted in February, 2008, shows that 77% of Iraqis remain opposed to the U.S.
occupation, including 77% of Shiites and 95% percent of Sunnis.We are continually told that we must stay in Iraq to prevent a sectarian blood bath. But the Iraqi
people don't seem to share this fear, and perhaps with good reason. A study of violent attacks in
Iraq indicates that the sectarian violence has largely subsided, and that most of the remaining
violence is directed at the occupation, and at government officials who are perceived to be
collaborating with US. forces. This would seem to indicate that violence in Iraq could dwindle away to nothing, if only we would
leave. Of course, no one can guarantee what will happen if U.S. forces depart. But the same is true for the
opposite position. It's possible the violence will continue precisely because the occupation
continues. It's time to cut through the pointless, circular debate. It's time to ask the Iraqi people what they
want, NOT what U.S. politicians want, and NOT even what the Iraqi government wants. Instead, we
should request that the Iraqi people be allowed to decide for themselves. Didn't President Bush say
he wanted democracy for Iraq? If you agree with this idea, please send Congress a message. Tell Congress to pass a resolution
asking the Iraqi government to hold a public referendum on whether or not the U.S. occupation
should continue. You can send that message here.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
Quote of the Day:"The points that were put forth by the Americans were more abominable than the occupation."
-- Jalal al Din al-Saghir, leading lawmaker from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, responding to
U.S. requests for a treaty of permanent occupationSubject: Support an Iraqi referendum on the occupationHeadlines across America screamed the news this week. The U.S. government is seeking 58
permanent military bases in Iraq. Is this what you want? It certainly seems to NOT be what the Iraqi people want, given the violent
protests it has provoked.President Bush thinks U.S. military personnel should stay in Iraq for decades, the way they have in
Korea. John McCain says he's willing for U.S. troops to stay in Iraq for one hundred years, assuming,
he says, that there's no violence. But if Iraq becomes peaceful, why would U.S. forces even be
needed? Shouldn't we finally, at long last, ask the Iraqi people what they want? ABC News polled Iraqis in September of 2007. It found that 79% oppose the occupation, including
80% of Shiites, and 95% of Sunnis. Another poll conducted in February, 2008, shows that 77% of Iraqis remain opposed to the U.S.
occupation, including 77% of Shiites and 95% percent of Sunnis.We are continually told that we must stay in Iraq to prevent a sectarian blood bath. But the Iraqi
people don't seem to share this fear, and perhaps with good reason. A study of violent attacks in
Iraq indicates that the sectarian violence has largely subsided, and that most of the remaining
violence is directed at the occupation, and at government officials who are perceived to be
collaborating with US. forces. This would seem to indicate that violence in Iraq could dwindle away to nothing, if only we would
leave. Of course, no one can guarantee what will happen if U.S. forces depart. But the same is true for the
opposite position. It's possible the violence will continue precisely because the occupation
continues. It's time to cut through the pointless, circular debate. It's time to ask the Iraqi people what they
want, NOT what U.S. politicians want, and NOT even what the Iraqi government wants. Instead, we
should request that the Iraqi people be allowed to decide for themselves. Didn't President Bush say
he wanted democracy for Iraq? If you agree with this idea, please send Congress a message. Tell Congress to pass a resolution
asking the Iraqi government to hold a public referendum on whether or not the U.S. occupation
should continue. You can send that message here.
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
