Once again, Kevin fails to see the "bigger picture" . . .
There is no such thing as LIBERAL BIAS in the media, and there never has been such a thing in any of our lifetimes. This concept of LIBERAL BIAS is nonsense, pure and simple.
>>Kent you got the blinders on if you really think this, pure an simple. How many journalists have
>>you met that were right wing? Not many

Less than 50 people control all of what we see, hear, and read, in ALL FORMS OF NEWS MEDIA in the USA. And, none of these 50 people represent the left, or the liberal wing of the political spectrum. Kevin, you need to do some homework before you make foolish comments like this, because the level of money needed to become a MEDIA BARON in this day and age absolutely precludes that owner from any sort of liberal bias.
Let me repeat this very important point:
The level of money needed to become a MEDIA BARON in this day and age precludes that owner from any sort of liberal bias.
The owners of all the media outlets are members of all the secret political organizations, such as the Council On Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and others that don't even have names, or keep records. Not a single member of any of these organizations has ever proposed an agenda that could even be disguised as liberal, because in the end, it all ends up being what they want and not what we need.
>>Thank god for the Fox network so I do not have to listen to the slimey Dan Rather

Let me repeat this very important point:
In the end, it all ends up being what THEY want, and NOT what WE need!
>>Agreed, money generally drives it

Kevin--- I defy you to show me just one example of this so-called liberal bias in the media or anywhere else. Because when the true agenda behind the legislation (or news story) is unveiled, that liberal bias goes right out the window!
>Well lets see here:
>They never ask hardball questions of any democrat:
>Just look at any Larry King interview what a patsy

>Gave the Clintons a pass on every scandal
>What do think would have happened to Gary Condit had he been a Republican
>He would have been strung up thats what

>Republicrats or Democans, they are all one in the same!

Is YOUR AGENDA being represented in Washington, DC?
Mine sure as HELL isn't, and everyone here knows that for me, I espouse nothing but PEACE and PRAYERS.
>We have tried that and some people just dont get it. Hint 9/11

What was PEACEFUL about 9/11?
>Not

What is PRAYERFUL about BOMBING IRAQ (again)?
>Um disarm Sadaam Husseein maybe? Is it going to take the obliteration of the USA before
>you get this?