You make a valid point, Ed.  Not sure what Rossy’s not following. It never deadpans out to a clean explanation, no matter how the prudent economist endeavors to solemnly spin the spin we're in.

Another example:  I’m not positive but, it seems there were questions whether the so-called Somalian pirates were actually "terrorists." Seems there’s another opinion that suggests they stem from a small mostly civil band of fishermen, fathers …of children, children who’s beach washes up with barrels of industrial waste, poisoning their bodies and their little brothers and sisters in their mamas’ uteruses, industrial waste that may have been allegedly thrown into the sea on a regular basis by certain alleged companies who have no love for that opportune stretch of seawater. And so it’s possible there’s a gray area as to EXACTLY WHO the definitive “terrorists” are.  But we’ve seen this sort of domestic … and such … “terror” for decades, no?  Mostly it gets innocents and guilties injured or dead, costs insurance companies, bottom line, and fills the courts with caseloads that probably often fail to resolve much of anything JUSTLY, except in fiction. That’s not to say there aren’t excellent paralegals out amongst the workforce and love slaves staking chain-link claim to the legislative body of laws -n- legalese in compelling ways. . .And in some cases, probably otherwise decent…law abiding…organizationally-minded people get put away…when they could be at home with their families. Passion/pain. Money resolves to suit the money, self-styled patriots jailed to suit the legislators, as irresponsible business wills the day to continue unabated in a timely fashion.  A rift, …and only a rift.  And another trillion in bailout, baby.

Why were we born? …For LOVE.   ...Seems somebody …important…revised the plan?