Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
"In the late 1930s, the noted economist Friedrich Von Hayek wrote his landmark pamphlet 'Road to
Serfdom,' laying bare the diseased skeleton of socialist/utopian thought that had permeated academia
and the salons of his day. With an economy of words that showcased the significance of his
conclusion, he pointed out the Achilles heel of collectivist dogma: for a planned economy to succeed,
there must be central planners, who by necessity will insist on universal commitment to their plan.
How do you attain total commitment to a goal from a free people? Well, you don't. Some percentage
will always disagree, even if only for the sake of being contrary or out of a desire to be left alone.
When considering a program as comprehensive as a government-planned economy, there are
undoubtedly countless points of contention, such as how we will choose the planners, how we will
order our priorities when assigning them importance within the plan, how we will allocate resources
when competing interests have legitimate claims, who will make these decisions, and perhaps more
pertinent to our discussion, how those decisions will be enforced. A rift forming on even one of these
issues is enough to bring the gears of this progressive endeavor grinding to a halt. This fatal flaw in
the collectivist design cannot be reengineered. It is an error so critical that the entire ideology must be
scrapped." --columnist Joe Herring
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
"In the late 1930s, the noted economist Friedrich Von Hayek wrote his landmark pamphlet 'Road to
Serfdom,' laying bare the diseased skeleton of socialist/utopian thought that had permeated academia
and the salons of his day. With an economy of words that showcased the significance of his
conclusion, he pointed out the Achilles heel of collectivist dogma: for a planned economy to succeed,
there must be central planners, who by necessity will insist on universal commitment to their plan.
How do you attain total commitment to a goal from a free people? Well, you don't. Some percentage
will always disagree, even if only for the sake of being contrary or out of a desire to be left alone.
When considering a program as comprehensive as a government-planned economy, there are
undoubtedly countless points of contention, such as how we will choose the planners, how we will
order our priorities when assigning them importance within the plan, how we will allocate resources
when competing interests have legitimate claims, who will make these decisions, and perhaps more
pertinent to our discussion, how those decisions will be enforced. A rift forming on even one of these
issues is enough to bring the gears of this progressive endeavor grinding to a halt. This fatal flaw in
the collectivist design cannot be reengineered. It is an error so critical that the entire ideology must be
scrapped." --columnist Joe Herring
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
