Hi everybody. This little poem is for this rotten anniversary,
and all that's followed since.Stand By Your Loved Ones SteadyWinter it rolls like a tank over spring
leaves a smell there of fear
and of dust
Heartbreaking cries from the city outside
and nobody knows who to trust
People are nervous
the lies hang as thick
as the smell of burning hair
and underground rivers
of hate
build in force
and madness is in the airSo stand by your loved ones steady
for this world is a world ruled by lies
Raise a toast for the dead
and the blood that they shed
and a toast for those yet to dieThe following was in my email this morning.PeaceDavidHow Did Iraq Get Its Weapons? America Sold
Them
Published on Sunday, September 8, 2002 by the
Sunday Herald (Scotland)
How Did Iraq Get Its Weapons? We Sold Them
by Neil Mackay and Felicity ArbuthnotTHE US and Britain sold Saddam Hussein the
technology and materials Iraq needed to
develop nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons of mass destruction.Reports by the US Senate's committee on
banking, housing and urban affairs -- which
oversees American exports policy -- reveal that
the US, under the successive administrations of
Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, sold
materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West
Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up
until March 1992, as well as germs similar to
tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria
sold included brucella melitensis, which
damages major organs, and clostridium
perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.Classified US Defense Department documents
also seen by the Sunday Herald show that
Britain sold Iraq the drug pralidoxine, an
antidote to nerve gas, in March 1992, after the
end of the Gulf war. Pralidoxine can be reverse
engineered to create nerve gas.The Senate committee's reports on 'US
Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related
Dual-Use Exports to Iraq', undertaken in 1992 in
the wake of the Gulf war, give the date and
destination of all US exports. The reports show,
for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches of
bacillus anthracis -- the micro-organism that
causes anthrax -- were shipped to the Iraqi
Ministry of Higher Education, along with two
batches of the bacterium clostridium botulinum,
the agent that causes deadly botulism
poisoning.One batch each of salmonella and E coli were
shipped to the Iraqi State Company for Drug
Industries on August 31, 1987. Other shipments
went from the US to the Iraq Atomic Energy
Commission on July 11, 1988; the Department
of Biology at the University of Basrah in
November 1989; the Department of Microbiology
at Baghdad University in June 1985; the Ministry
of Health in April 1985 and Officers' City, a
military complex in Baghdad, in March and April
1986.
The shipments to Iraq went on even after
Saddam Hussein ordered the gassing of the
Kurdish town of Halabja, in which at least 5000
men, women and children died. The atrocity,
which shocked the world, took place in March
1988, but a month later the components and
materials of weapons of mass destruction were
continuing to arrive in Baghdad from the US.The Senate report also makes clear that: 'The
United States provided the government of Iraq
with 'dual use' licensed materials which
assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical,
biological and missile-system programs.'
This assistance, according to the report,
included 'chemical warfare-agent precursors,
chemical warfare-agent production facility plans
and technical drawings, chemical warfare filling
equipment, biological warfare-related materials,
missile fabrication equipment and missile
system guidance equipment'.Donald Riegle, then chairman of the committee,
said: 'UN inspectors had identified many United
States manufactured items that had been
exported from the United States to Iraq under
licenses issued by the Department of
Commerce, and [established] that these items
were used to further Iraq's chemical and nuclear
weapons development and its missile delivery
system development programs.'Riegle added that, between January 1985 and
August 1990, the 'executive branch of our
government approved 771 different export
licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq.
I think that is a devastating record'.It is thought the information contained in the
Senate committee reports is likely to make up
much of the 'evidence of proof' that Bush and
Blair will reveal in the coming days to justify the
US and Britain going to war with Iraq. It is
unlikely, however, that the two leaders will admit
it was the Western powers that armed Saddam
with these weapons of mass destruction.However, Bush and Blair will also have to prove
that Saddam still has chemical, biological and
nuclear capabilities. This looks like a difficult
case to clinch in view of the fact that Scott Ritter,
the UN's former chief weapons inspector in Iraq,
says the United Nations destroyed most of
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and doubts
that Saddam could have rebuilt his stocks by
now.According to Ritter, between 90% and 95% of
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were des
troyed by the UN. He believes the remainder
were probably used or destroyed during 'the
ravages of the Gulf War'.Ritter has described himself as a 'card-carrying
Republican' who voted for George W Bush.
Nevertheless, he has called the president a 'liar'
over his claims that Saddam Hussein is a threat
to America.Ritter has also alleged that the manufacture of
chemical and biological weapons emits certain
gases, which would have been detected by
satellite. 'We have seen none of this,' he insists.
'If Iraq was producing weapons today, we would
have definitive proof.'He also dismisses claims that Iraq may have a
nuclear weapons capacity or be on the verge of
attaining one, saying that gamma-particle
atomic radiation from the radioactive materials
in the warheads would also have been detected
by western surveillance.The UN's former co-ordinator in Iraq and former
UN under-secretary general, Count Hans von
Sponeck, has also told the Sunday Herald that
he believes the West is lying about Iraq's
weapons program.Von Sponeck visited the Al-Dora and Faluja
factories near Baghdad in 1999 after they were
'comprehensively trashed' on the orders of UN
inspectors, on the grounds that they were
suspected of being chemical weapons plants.
He returned to the site late in July this year, with
a German TV crew, and said both plants were
still wrecked.'We filmed the evidence of the dishonesty of the
claims that they were producing chemical and
biological weapons,' von Sponeck has told the
Sunday Herald. 'They are indeed in the same
destroyed state which we witnessed in 1999.
There was no trace of any resumed activity at
all.'©2002 smg sunday newspapers ltd
B
Baerwald
(view)
Hi everybody. This little poem is for this rotten anniversary,
and all that's followed since.Stand By Your Loved Ones SteadyWinter it rolls like a tank over spring
leaves a smell there of fear
and of dust
Heartbreaking cries from the city outside
and nobody knows who to trust
People are nervous
the lies hang as thick
as the smell of burning hair
and underground rivers
of hate
build in force
and madness is in the airSo stand by your loved ones steady
for this world is a world ruled by lies
Raise a toast for the dead
and the blood that they shed
and a toast for those yet to dieThe following was in my email this morning.PeaceDavidHow Did Iraq Get Its Weapons? America Sold
Them
Published on Sunday, September 8, 2002 by the
Sunday Herald (Scotland)
How Did Iraq Get Its Weapons? We Sold Them
by Neil Mackay and Felicity ArbuthnotTHE US and Britain sold Saddam Hussein the
technology and materials Iraq needed to
develop nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons of mass destruction.Reports by the US Senate's committee on
banking, housing and urban affairs -- which
oversees American exports policy -- reveal that
the US, under the successive administrations of
Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, sold
materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West
Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up
until March 1992, as well as germs similar to
tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria
sold included brucella melitensis, which
damages major organs, and clostridium
perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.Classified US Defense Department documents
also seen by the Sunday Herald show that
Britain sold Iraq the drug pralidoxine, an
antidote to nerve gas, in March 1992, after the
end of the Gulf war. Pralidoxine can be reverse
engineered to create nerve gas.The Senate committee's reports on 'US
Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related
Dual-Use Exports to Iraq', undertaken in 1992 in
the wake of the Gulf war, give the date and
destination of all US exports. The reports show,
for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches of
bacillus anthracis -- the micro-organism that
causes anthrax -- were shipped to the Iraqi
Ministry of Higher Education, along with two
batches of the bacterium clostridium botulinum,
the agent that causes deadly botulism
poisoning.One batch each of salmonella and E coli were
shipped to the Iraqi State Company for Drug
Industries on August 31, 1987. Other shipments
went from the US to the Iraq Atomic Energy
Commission on July 11, 1988; the Department
of Biology at the University of Basrah in
November 1989; the Department of Microbiology
at Baghdad University in June 1985; the Ministry
of Health in April 1985 and Officers' City, a
military complex in Baghdad, in March and April
1986.
The shipments to Iraq went on even after
Saddam Hussein ordered the gassing of the
Kurdish town of Halabja, in which at least 5000
men, women and children died. The atrocity,
which shocked the world, took place in March
1988, but a month later the components and
materials of weapons of mass destruction were
continuing to arrive in Baghdad from the US.The Senate report also makes clear that: 'The
United States provided the government of Iraq
with 'dual use' licensed materials which
assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical,
biological and missile-system programs.'
This assistance, according to the report,
included 'chemical warfare-agent precursors,
chemical warfare-agent production facility plans
and technical drawings, chemical warfare filling
equipment, biological warfare-related materials,
missile fabrication equipment and missile
system guidance equipment'.Donald Riegle, then chairman of the committee,
said: 'UN inspectors had identified many United
States manufactured items that had been
exported from the United States to Iraq under
licenses issued by the Department of
Commerce, and [established] that these items
were used to further Iraq's chemical and nuclear
weapons development and its missile delivery
system development programs.'Riegle added that, between January 1985 and
August 1990, the 'executive branch of our
government approved 771 different export
licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq.
I think that is a devastating record'.It is thought the information contained in the
Senate committee reports is likely to make up
much of the 'evidence of proof' that Bush and
Blair will reveal in the coming days to justify the
US and Britain going to war with Iraq. It is
unlikely, however, that the two leaders will admit
it was the Western powers that armed Saddam
with these weapons of mass destruction.However, Bush and Blair will also have to prove
that Saddam still has chemical, biological and
nuclear capabilities. This looks like a difficult
case to clinch in view of the fact that Scott Ritter,
the UN's former chief weapons inspector in Iraq,
says the United Nations destroyed most of
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and doubts
that Saddam could have rebuilt his stocks by
now.According to Ritter, between 90% and 95% of
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were des
troyed by the UN. He believes the remainder
were probably used or destroyed during 'the
ravages of the Gulf War'.Ritter has described himself as a 'card-carrying
Republican' who voted for George W Bush.
Nevertheless, he has called the president a 'liar'
over his claims that Saddam Hussein is a threat
to America.Ritter has also alleged that the manufacture of
chemical and biological weapons emits certain
gases, which would have been detected by
satellite. 'We have seen none of this,' he insists.
'If Iraq was producing weapons today, we would
have definitive proof.'He also dismisses claims that Iraq may have a
nuclear weapons capacity or be on the verge of
attaining one, saying that gamma-particle
atomic radiation from the radioactive materials
in the warheads would also have been detected
by western surveillance.The UN's former co-ordinator in Iraq and former
UN under-secretary general, Count Hans von
Sponeck, has also told the Sunday Herald that
he believes the West is lying about Iraq's
weapons program.Von Sponeck visited the Al-Dora and Faluja
factories near Baghdad in 1999 after they were
'comprehensively trashed' on the orders of UN
inspectors, on the grounds that they were
suspected of being chemical weapons plants.
He returned to the site late in July this year, with
a German TV crew, and said both plants were
still wrecked.'We filmed the evidence of the dishonesty of the
claims that they were producing chemical and
biological weapons,' von Sponeck has told the
Sunday Herald. 'They are indeed in the same
destroyed state which we witnessed in 1999.
There was no trace of any resumed activity at
all.'©2002 smg sunday newspapers ltd
