A few days ago, David made a comment about the Bush decision to drop the lowered EPA arsenic limits. Here�s a link to a NY Times article about the arsenic controversy as seen from New Mexico, where the municipal water supplies will have to comply with any lowered limits.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/14/national/14ARSE.html
Contrary to rumor, mining companies are largely indifferent to lowered arsenic limits. They pretty much have treatment facilities built for their discharge water and arsenic is not a major problem for them
Arsenic
Dave Tahija
location: Butte, Montana, en route from San Francisco to Juneau
listening to: Train - Save me, San Francisco
registered: 1999.12.27
posts: 261
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
D
Dave Tahija
(view)
A few days ago, David made a comment about the Bush decision to drop the lowered EPA arsenic limits. Here�s a link to a NY Times article about the arsenic controversy as seen from New Mexico, where the municipal water supplies will have to comply with any lowered limits.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/14/national/14ARSE.html
Contrary to rumor, mining companies are largely indifferent to lowered arsenic limits. They pretty much have treatment facilities built for their discharge water and arsenic is not a major problem for them
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/14/national/14ARSE.html
Contrary to rumor, mining companies are largely indifferent to lowered arsenic limits. They pretty much have treatment facilities built for their discharge water and arsenic is not a major problem for them
