BS......how offensive....
EEE
location: Landscape Challenged Illinois
listening to: 16 Horsepower, black music from the 70's & and still going broke from Paste Magazine
registered: 2002.08.26
posts: 3227
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Pat, where do you come up with this crap?"Liberals are pure pacifists Eric. The PC feel good group.They have the logic if we "understand" this group it will help later on. That is like saying if we truly understood Hannibal Lector he would not murder again. After 911 the Democrats appeared to stand strong behind the president but it was all a show. It does not take long to see through the smokescreen the liberals put up. Carl Rove is just stating the obvious"
Pat, sometimes I wonder if you just post the replies you do to stir shit. I doubt you will do this, but I suggest you do a little research and examine who are some of the most toughest vets out there and you will find out many are "liberals". How about George McGovern? How about Wesley Clark? How about General Zinni? How about the deceased Col Hackworth? Then compare these people who are in charge of this current war - very, very few of them have any military experience and it is showing - terribly.Tell me...is this the type of government you want? Where it is now coming out that the US was secretly bombing Iraq?http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1669640,00.htmlAnd again, we go back to the truth - 17 of the 19 hijackers were SAUDIA ARABIAN. The majority of the foreign insurgents flooding into Iraq are SAUDI ARABIAN, not Iraqi. Where the liberals made their mistake is in failing to make Bush and his people provide a detailed plan. Instead, they let him start the proper path to Afghanistan and then make the idiotic detour to Iraq. Now as for "understanding" our enemy - that is a basic strategy needed to carry out winning tactics. And I have never heard, seen or read any CREDIBLE liberal state we need to "understand" the enemy to provide "indictments" and "therapy" to terrorists. Oh, but guess what.....the Bushies are secretly talking to the terrorists...if this were a bunch of Democrats the right would be screaming "TRAITORS" at the top of their lungs. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4624385.stmAnd you never answered my question about the Geneva Convention I posted below?Since you choose to use the FauxNews "uniform" standard for POW's, what treatment do you expect for our covert soldiers and CIA operatives that are dressing like the enemy to carry out their missions? (Though I suggest you read more about the Geneva Conventions because they are much more complex than just wearing a uniform - for example, for one to be treated as an "unlawful enemy combatant" the person must be adjudicated as such....oops...guess that means bringing them up before a judge of some sort).
E
EEE
(view)
Pat, where do you come up with this crap?"Liberals are pure pacifists Eric. The PC feel good group.They have the logic if we "understand" this group it will help later on. That is like saying if we truly understood Hannibal Lector he would not murder again. After 911 the Democrats appeared to stand strong behind the president but it was all a show. It does not take long to see through the smokescreen the liberals put up. Carl Rove is just stating the obvious"
Pat, sometimes I wonder if you just post the replies you do to stir shit. I doubt you will do this, but I suggest you do a little research and examine who are some of the most toughest vets out there and you will find out many are "liberals". How about George McGovern? How about Wesley Clark? How about General Zinni? How about the deceased Col Hackworth? Then compare these people who are in charge of this current war - very, very few of them have any military experience and it is showing - terribly.Tell me...is this the type of government you want? Where it is now coming out that the US was secretly bombing Iraq?http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1669640,00.htmlAnd again, we go back to the truth - 17 of the 19 hijackers were SAUDIA ARABIAN. The majority of the foreign insurgents flooding into Iraq are SAUDI ARABIAN, not Iraqi. Where the liberals made their mistake is in failing to make Bush and his people provide a detailed plan. Instead, they let him start the proper path to Afghanistan and then make the idiotic detour to Iraq. Now as for "understanding" our enemy - that is a basic strategy needed to carry out winning tactics. And I have never heard, seen or read any CREDIBLE liberal state we need to "understand" the enemy to provide "indictments" and "therapy" to terrorists. Oh, but guess what.....the Bushies are secretly talking to the terrorists...if this were a bunch of Democrats the right would be screaming "TRAITORS" at the top of their lungs. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4624385.stmAnd you never answered my question about the Geneva Convention I posted below?Since you choose to use the FauxNews "uniform" standard for POW's, what treatment do you expect for our covert soldiers and CIA operatives that are dressing like the enemy to carry out their missions? (Though I suggest you read more about the Geneva Conventions because they are much more complex than just wearing a uniform - for example, for one to be treated as an "unlawful enemy combatant" the person must be adjudicated as such....oops...guess that means bringing them up before a judge of some sort).
