I thought it was compelling.  The pentagon matter is the key to the whole story. 

If there was no plane as they say there was, then (a) who/what hit the pentagon and (b) what really happened to Flight 77? 

If the photos taken within the first minute before the wall collapsed can be believed, e.g., if no windows were broken as shown, then quite obviously the pentagon was not hit by a plane.  End of story. 

So, either the pictures are genuine and the pentagon was not hit by a plane, or the pictures are fake and the whole doc is a fraud. 

What's really damning is how the government never chose to investigate the actual attacks.  The White House convinced Congress to only investigate the "intelligence failures" - which itself is a self-fulfilling prophecy and assumes that there really was a failure of intelligence.

I don't know.  When you add up the Downing Street Memo, this video and how anyone who got in the way was treated (Joe Wilson for example), things really do start to add up. 

As I've said before, this video is really important viewing.  I would love to hear from someone who could point out the problems with the video.  Otherwise, I'm left to conclude that it's probably fairly accurate in the assumptions it makes.  I'm of course assuming that the author of the film did not intentionally doctor any of the media used in the film of course....  I'm also assuming that a common sense reading of the evidence can point to a conclusion that won't necessarily be refuted by physicists, etc.