That chart has been making the rounds a lot lately, but it highlights an
obvious factor that almost never gets addressed. Yes, it's true that the
states with the highest rates of firearm deaths have limited gun laws, but
other states have similar laws but with much lower ratios.Look at Kansas, then look at Alaska. Everything is identical except for
the number on the left. Now look at Vermont, then NH, only moderate
differences with even smaller numbers to the left. The type of gun laws isn't the sole factor here but people use this chart
to make it seem so (although I do not oppose background checks, concealed
carry permits, or felony prohibitions). Population density, poverty,
education level, mental health (the proportion of firearm suicides in
Alaska is huge) and other societal factors come into play.As for kids using guns to settle scores---by and large, those guns were
purchased outside of legal channels and completely ignored existing gun
laws.
P
pkjensen
(view)
That chart has been making the rounds a lot lately, but it highlights an
obvious factor that almost never gets addressed. Yes, it's true that the
states with the highest rates of firearm deaths have limited gun laws, but
other states have similar laws but with much lower ratios.Look at Kansas, then look at Alaska. Everything is identical except for
the number on the left. Now look at Vermont, then NH, only moderate
differences with even smaller numbers to the left. The type of gun laws isn't the sole factor here but people use this chart
to make it seem so (although I do not oppose background checks, concealed
carry permits, or felony prohibitions). Population density, poverty,
education level, mental health (the proportion of firearm suicides in
Alaska is huge) and other societal factors come into play.As for kids using guns to settle scores---by and large, those guns were
purchased outside of legal channels and completely ignored existing gun
laws.
posted 2015.10.26
posted on October 26th 2015
