"For example, Peter T. posts an article and asks pointed questions and then Pat Brown immediately dismisses any facts in the article because of the source that printed the article."

----------------------

Kind of like you guys do with Fox News?

Let's face it, the Sierra Club has an agenda. They certainly do not hide it so I do not see why they should be viewed as an "objective source".

Also, I do not think that the right has a monopoly on sarcasm around here.  "Dumbya","Shrub", those idiotic little "awards" and "end of the year lists". These are what you think passes for honest discourse?

I brought up what I thought was a valid point in an earlier post. I asked if folks thought that the ACLU would support Bob Novak protecting his source (regarding the supposed CIA "leak"). I am curious as to whether people think they will stick to thier principles or if they will turn a blind eye in teh interest of furthering thier political agenda against George Bush. Ya know what?

Nobody responded. Zip, Nada.Zero.

I tried to start a discussion here some time ago about whether ot not the Democrats decidedly pronounced slide to the far left was going to hurt them in the election. A few sarcastyic replies and then more Zip, Nada,Zero.

You guys post the most outrageous sort of crap here comparing George Bush to the Taliban, John Ashcroft to the Nazis, and WE are the reactionary ones?

You view everything that happens in the world around you through this lens of "Republican EVIL", but then you have the balls to claim that those on the RIGHT are not interested in having a discussion?

Please give me just a small break. There is no having a discussion with anyone on this board save a few. THE RIGHT did not set the tone here.

It is set by everyone.