Please elaborate because I may want to pack my bags while the gittin is doable. I'm gettin the same willies I got when I first heard the phrase Homeland Security.

As to the explosives: supposedly during the initial invasion ABC had a news crew imbedded with the first americans troops to visit those warehouses and the explosives were gone then. Maybe we shouldn't have announced for months we were going to invade, I mean liberate Iraq. Perhaps ABC has footage?

And I'm with Eric about the thrill of seeing a president(Carter), or at least his limo(Clinton); neither of whom I support because they are internationalists not americans. And yet, I'd help Carter build a house.

I heard only Cheney was demanding loyalty oaths but if true, it's still chicken shit unamerican nonsense-LIKE FREE SPEECH ZONES dammit! Why aren't Americans up in arms about this stuff. More to the point it suggests america would have a decisive reaction to the real Dick Cheney, were he to reveal himself before the cameras.

Finally, to the Administration, keeping 'all' the oil supply flowing is probably a very high priority. Even without asking what would happen in the streets of this country if the flow diminished to the point of 72-73, is it even a question which is more important to any government: the troops or the oil? If it is, you are not paying attention to current events.

> it will be a decisive win for Bush and then the changes they are a comin. it will be a decisive win for Bush and then the changes they are a comin. it will be a decisive win for Bush and then the changes they are a comin.

And what do you mean Pat? You're down there in Texas, what have you heard? Are the folks who won't sign loyalty cards gonna disappear? Or just evacuated to a (remote but secure) free speech zone? Spill man!