Stumbled across that while researching, thought the lady's here could handle that historic fact.-) Considering the times, I thought it was very compassionate advise; and the basket, however unpleasant was at least an interestingly honest remark. Obviously Ben wasn't the author of the one about ol' glory.

As to your question(s), I'll take a stab.

The only problem I have with this doctors position is the last moment nature of his objection, regardless of whether it puts the lady at greater risk. He should have done his research. And frankly, I think his patient should know her doctors position(s) on such issues(assuming it was the family doctor). Meaning why hadn't this come up sooner, y'know?

Too, as with the pharmacist(s), I believe freedom of conscience is imparitive, in the US and everywhere. Give me a reason why one should be forced to sell an item they disagree with the usage/ outcome of. Say cocaine was legalized and the pharmacist in your neighborhood objected(despite the initial line around the corner). Once word got out, the line would form elsewhere. I guess my solution were I a pharmacist, would be to put a sign in the window stating what items I don't distribute, and perhaps why.

In your view is that unreasonable?

Question Andrea: I am assuming you are referring to birth control; what other perscriptions are being refused to be filled.

One of the ideals the founders were striving toward was complete freedom of conscience. Meaning a great majority thought it essential that this be a nation where anyone could believe what they wished, openly and peaceably. Many espoused that it was the governments duty to insure that proposition. I think our nation, and leaders need to return to that standard.

Montag