Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Hi Kevin:I wasn't talking about loving couples. Nor was Bill Maher. Nor was
Gregg. Though I didn't see the show, I'm sure there was, as in
Gregg's post, a strong undercurrent of 'hehehe, wish it was like
that when I was in HS'. And you know that(I suspect)!For your sake let's change to a more noble(seemingly:) creature.
Although dog is apt when boys are trying/hoping to get laid, cause
'most' anything will do. Perhaps this didn't apply to you or your
circle in HS but when I was a young buck most of the fellows I knew
were rutting by the time they were in junior high. It was an ever
present topic of conversation. The wild oats syndrome is a
biological urge, which has little to do with love at that age, or ever
as best I can tell. Every guy in that audience who was tittering, I
guarantee, was thinking pretty much the same as Gregg wrote and
Maher undoubtedly suggested coyly. They only quit trying because
of consequences: marriage, getting busted, fear of disease,
divorced, or masturbation better fit their budget/personality. Peal
back the facade and we're not pretty creatures.So, can we agree, that we are speaking of sex. Just sex. Horny
rutting boys, with girls who have been convinced by the authorities
and social presures in their realm that oral sex isn't really sex, and
who have figured out that getting buggered is better than getting
pregnant; which has lead to the increase in oral SEXUALLY
Transmitted Disease's in the past decade. Is that good for our
children/society, in your opinion? So what, you don't have
children, how about a neice, a little sister? Is that what you would
want/hope for them?Look I gathered a long time ago that you are homosexual. I don't
care. I look forward to your monthly music reviews. So don't try to
turn this into something other than what I responded to: taking
this sexual trend among this nations youth lightly. I'm not
intimated by PC speech, though I too know what I'm not 'spose to
say, even when I do anyway.And hey, if you have a loving homosexual relationship, you're
doing better than most of the queers or breeders, that I've ever
known. Cause at the bottom of most sexual politics between
breeders(shouldn't I be offended-)it is a derogatory term on your
part isn't it?), is security and sex not love. I mean comeon, most
people seem to equate sex with love.So if you like, let's go a few more rounds on the disgusting aspects
of the humon condition. I'm not afraid, I promise you.o)Your dear friend, Montag
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
Hi Kevin:I wasn't talking about loving couples. Nor was Bill Maher. Nor was
Gregg. Though I didn't see the show, I'm sure there was, as in
Gregg's post, a strong undercurrent of 'hehehe, wish it was like
that when I was in HS'. And you know that(I suspect)!For your sake let's change to a more noble(seemingly:) creature.
Although dog is apt when boys are trying/hoping to get laid, cause
'most' anything will do. Perhaps this didn't apply to you or your
circle in HS but when I was a young buck most of the fellows I knew
were rutting by the time they were in junior high. It was an ever
present topic of conversation. The wild oats syndrome is a
biological urge, which has little to do with love at that age, or ever
as best I can tell. Every guy in that audience who was tittering, I
guarantee, was thinking pretty much the same as Gregg wrote and
Maher undoubtedly suggested coyly. They only quit trying because
of consequences: marriage, getting busted, fear of disease,
divorced, or masturbation better fit their budget/personality. Peal
back the facade and we're not pretty creatures.So, can we agree, that we are speaking of sex. Just sex. Horny
rutting boys, with girls who have been convinced by the authorities
and social presures in their realm that oral sex isn't really sex, and
who have figured out that getting buggered is better than getting
pregnant; which has lead to the increase in oral SEXUALLY
Transmitted Disease's in the past decade. Is that good for our
children/society, in your opinion? So what, you don't have
children, how about a neice, a little sister? Is that what you would
want/hope for them?Look I gathered a long time ago that you are homosexual. I don't
care. I look forward to your monthly music reviews. So don't try to
turn this into something other than what I responded to: taking
this sexual trend among this nations youth lightly. I'm not
intimated by PC speech, though I too know what I'm not 'spose to
say, even when I do anyway.And hey, if you have a loving homosexual relationship, you're
doing better than most of the queers or breeders, that I've ever
known. Cause at the bottom of most sexual politics between
breeders(shouldn't I be offended-)it is a derogatory term on your
part isn't it?), is security and sex not love. I mean comeon, most
people seem to equate sex with love.So if you like, let's go a few more rounds on the disgusting aspects
of the humon condition. I'm not afraid, I promise you.o)Your dear friend, Montag
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
posted 2005.04.04
posted on April 4th 2005
G
Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Abstinence Sucks by Bill Maher – GreggW on April 2nd, 2005
