Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Well I'd imagine there is a fatal flaw in that statement from you, Marc, but I give you credit for having already spotted that (and likely just giving me a hard time for the fun of it) because I give you credit for being a very bright guy. Of course the flaw would be that you are in fact discussing Hitler or Nazis to begin with and or someone who has direct ties with them which in fact the Bush family does. So, I'd guess that law (which is a fabrication to begin with) does not apply here. In any case open discussion affords the opportunity to enter any theory into the mix. It would only be a society that submits to fascism that would recognize such a "law."
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
Well I'd imagine there is a fatal flaw in that statement from you, Marc, but I give you credit for having already spotted that (and likely just giving me a hard time for the fun of it) because I give you credit for being a very bright guy. Of course the flaw would be that you are in fact discussing Hitler or Nazis to begin with and or someone who has direct ties with them which in fact the Bush family does. So, I'd guess that law (which is a fabrication to begin with) does not apply here. In any case open discussion affords the opportunity to enter any theory into the mix. It would only be a society that submits to fascism that would recognize such a "law."
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
posted 2006.05.13
posted on May 13th 2006
Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Eugene on May 12th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – blockdog on May 12th, 2006
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Reg on May 12th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Kevin G on May 12th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Reg on May 12th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Green Mtn on May 13th, 2006-
Re: 9/11 conspiracy - Anybody see Richard Clarke on Bill Maher on Friday? – EEE on May 14th, 2006-
Re: 9/11 conspiracy - Anybody see Richard Clarke on Bill Maher on Friday? – Reg on May 21st, 2006-
Re: 9/11 conspiracy - Anybody see Richard Clarke on Bill Maher on Friday? – Andrea on May 21st, 2006-
Re: 9/11 conspiracy - Anybody see Richard Clarke on Bill Maher on Friday? – blockdog on May 24th, 2006-
Re: 9/11 conspiracy - Anybody see Richard Clarke on Bill Maher on Friday? – Andrea on May 24th, 2006
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Kevin G on May 13th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – stark raving brad on May 13th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Marc on May 13th, 2006
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – blockdog on May 13th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Green Mtn on May 13th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – blockdog on May 13th, 2006-
Re: Bush ratings at all time low, but... – Green Mtn on May 14th, 2006
Start with Block's link... – Reg on May 14th, 2006-
Re: Start with Block's link... – Kevin G on May 14th, 2006-
Re: Start with Block's link... – stark raving brad on May 14th, 2006
Re: Start with Block's link... – Reg on May 14th, 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
