Green Mtn
location: Observing the Progressive madness with considerably less amusement.
listening to: Grandchildren, the best reason for saving the future.
registered: 2004.04.03
posts: 2617
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
Corresponds with an Aussie study - which article I can no longer locate, shucks- regarding how the
corporate management environment is perfectly suited to psychopaths advancing faster, and
further up the ladder. Some of the quoted works should make for interesting reading. Comments
desired.
respects
Twilight of the Psychopaths
by Dr. Kevin Barrett
“Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for
maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's
insane about it.” – John Lennon, before his murder by CIA mind-control subject Mark David
Chapman
When Gandhi was asked his opinion of Western civilization he said it would be a good idea.
But that
oft-cited quote, is misleading, assuming as it does thatcivilization is an unmitigated blessing.
Civilized people, we are told, live peacefully and cooperatively with their fellows, sharing the
necessary labour in order to obtain the leisure to develop arts and sciences. And while that wouldbe
a good idea, it is not a good description of what has been going on in the so-called advanced
cultures during the past 8,000 years.
Civilization, as we know it, is largely the creation of psychopaths. All civilizations, our own
included, have been based on slavery and “warfare.” Incidentally, the latter term is a euphemism for
mass murder.
The prevailing recipe for civilization is simple:
1) Use lies and brainwashing to create an army of controlled, systematic mass murderers;
2) Use that army to enslave large numbers of people (i.e. seize control of their labour power
and its
fruits);
3) Use that slave labour power to improve the brainwashing process (by using the economic
surplus to employ scribes, priests, and PR men). Then go back to step one and repeat the process.
Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because
they
are hard-wired to lie, kill, injure, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without
feeling any remorse. The inventor of civilization — the first tribal chieftain who successfully
brainwashed an army of controlled mass murderers—was almost certainly a genetic psychopath.
Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-
psychopaths in the struggle for power in civilizational hierarchies — especially military hierarchies.
Military institutions are tailor-made for psychopathic killers. The 5% or so of human males who feel
no remorse about killing their fellow human beings make the best soldiers. And the 95% who are
extremely reluctant to kill make terrible soldiers — unless they are brainwashed with highly
sophisticated modern techniques that turn them (temporarily it is hoped) into functional
psychopaths.
In On Killing, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman has re-written military history, to highlight what other
histories hide: The fact that military science is less about strategy and technology, than about
overcoming the instinctive human reluctance to kill members of our own species. The true
“Revolution in Military Affairs” was not Donald Rumsfeld’s move to high-tech in 2001, but Brigadier
Gen. S.L.A. Marshall’s discovery in the 1940s that only 15-20% of World War II soldiers along the
line of fire would use their weapons: “Those (80-85%) who did not fire did not run or hide (in many
cases they were willing to risk great danger to rescue comrades, get ammunition, or run messages),
but they simply would not fire their weapons at the enemy, even when faced with repeated waves of
banzai charges” (Grossman, p. 4).
Marshall’s discovery and subsequent research, proved that in all previous wars, a tiny minority
of
soldiers — the 5% who are natural-born psychopaths, and perhaps a few temporarily-insane
imitators—did almost all the killing. Normal men just went through the motions and, if at all
possible, refused to take the life of an enemy soldier, even if that meant giving up their own. The
implication: Wars are ritualized mass murders by psychopaths of non-psychopaths. (This cannot be
good for humanity’s genetic endowment!)
Marshall’s work, brought a Copernican revolution to military science. In the past, everyone
believed
that the soldier willing to kill for his country was the (heroic) norm, while one who refused to fight
was a (cowardly) aberration. The truth, as it turned out, was that the normative soldier hailed from
the psychopathic five percent. The sane majority, would rather die than fight.
The implication, too frightening for even the likes of Marshall and Grossman to fully digest, was
that the norms for soldiers’ behaviour in battle had been set by psychopaths. That meant that
psychopaths were in control of the military as an institution. Worse, it meant that psychopaths were
in control of society’s perception of military affairs. Evidently, psychopaths exercised an enormous
amount of power in seemingly sane, normal society.
How could that be? In Political Ponerology,Andrzej Lobaczewski explains that clinical
psychopaths
enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because
they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie
detector tests) psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court,
for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane
opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the
truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and
then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those
charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military
and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with
psychopaths.
So-called conspiracy theorists, some of whom deserve the pejorative connotation of that
much-
abused term, often imagine that secret societies of Jews, Jesuits, bankers, communists,
Bilderbergers, Muslim extremists, papists, and so on, are secretly controlling history, doing
dastardly deeds, and/or threatening to take over the world. As a leading “conspiracy theorist”
according to Wikipedia, I feel eminently qualified to offer an alternative conspiracy theory which,
like the alternative conspiracy theory of 9/11, is both simpler and more accurate than the prevailing
wisdom: The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of
us.
Behind the apparent insanity of contemporary history, is the actual insanity of psychopaths fighting
to preserve their disproportionate power. And as that power grows ever-more-threatened, the
psychopaths grow ever-more-desperate. We are witnessing the apotheosis of the overworld—the
criminal syndicate or overlapping set of syndicates that lurks above ordinary society and law just as
the underworld lurks below it. In 9/11 and the 9/11 wars, we are seeing the final desperate power-
grab or “endgame” (Alex Jones) of brutal, cunning gangs of CIA drug-runners and President-killers;
money-laundering international bankers and their hit-men, economic and otherwise; corrupt
military contractors and gung-ho generals; corporate predators and their political enablers;
brainwashers and mind-rapists euphemistically known as psy-ops experts and PR specialists—in
short, the whole sick crew of certifiable psychopaths running our so-called civilization. And they
are running scared. It was their terror of losing control that they projected onto the rest of us by
blowing up the Twin Towers and inciting temporary psychopathic terror-rage in the American
public.
Why does the pathocracy fear it is losing control? Because it is threatened by the spread of
knowledge. The greatest fear of any psychopath is of being found out. As George H. W. Bush said to
journalist Sarah McClendon, December 1992, “If the people knew what we had done, they would
chase us down the street and lynch us.” Given that Bush is reported to have participated in parties
where child prostitutes were sodomized and otherwise abused, among his many other crimes, his
statement to McClendon should be taken seriously.
Psychopaths go through life knowing that they are completely different from other people.
They
quickly learn to hide their lack of empathy, while carefully studying others’ emotions so as to mimic
normalcy while cold-bloodedly manipulating the normals.
Today, thanks to new information technologies, we are on the brink of unmasking the
psychopaths
and building a civilization of, by and for the normal human being — a civilization without war, a
civilization based on truth, a civilization in which the saintly few rather than the diabolical few
would gravitate to positions of power. We already have the knowledge necessary to diagnose
psychopathic personalities and keep them out of power. We have the knowledge necessary to
dismantle the institutions in which psychopaths especially flourish — militaries, intelligence
agencies, large corporations, and secret societies. We simply need to disseminate this knowledge,
and the will to use it, as widely as possible.
Above all, we need to inform the public about how psychopaths co-opt and corrupt normal
human
beings. One way they do this, is by manipulating shame and denial — emotions foreign to
psychopaths but common and easily-induced among normals.
Consider how gangs and secret societies (psychopaths’ guilds in disguise) recruit new
members.
Some criminal gangs and satanist covens demand that candidates for admission commit a murder
to “earn their stripes.” Skull and Bones, the Yale-based secret society that supplies the CIA with
drug-runners, mind-rapists, child abusers and professional killers, requires neophytes to lie naked
in a coffin and masturbate in front of older members while reciting the candidate’s entire sexual
history. By forcing the neophyte to engage in ritualized behaviour that would be horrendously
shameful in normal society, the psychopaths’ guild destroys the candidate’s normal personality,
assuming he had one in the first place, and turns the individual into a co-opted, corrupt, degraded
shadow of his former self — a manufactured psychopath or psychopath’s apprentice.
This manipulation of shame has the added benefit of making psychopathic organizations
effectively
invisible to normal society. Despite easily available media reports, American voters in 2004 simply
refused to see that the two major-party presidential candidates had lain naked in a coffin
masturbating in front of older Bonesmen in order to gain admission to Skull and Bones and thus
become members of the criminal overworld. Likewise, many Americans have long refused to see
that hawkish elements of the overworld, operating through the CIA, had obviously been the
murderers of JFK, MLK, RFK, JFK Jr., Malcolm X, ChÈ, AllendÈ, Wellstone, Lumumba, Aguilera, Diem,
and countless other relatively non-psychopathic leaders. They refuse to see the continuing murders
of millions of people around the world in what amounts to an American holocaust. They refuse to
see the evidence that the psychopaths’ guilds running America’s most powerful institutions use the
most horrific forms of sexualized abuse imaginable to induce multiple-personality-disorder in
child victims, then use the resulting mind-control slaves as disposable drug-runners, prostitutes,
Manchurian candidates, and even diplomatic envoys. And of course they refuse to see that 9/11
was a transparently obvious inside job, and that their own psychopath-dominated military-
intelligence apparatus is behind almost every major terrorist outrage of recent decades.
All of this psychopathic behaviour at the top of the social hierarchy is simply too shameful for
ordinary people to see, so they avert their gaze, just as wives of husbands who are sexually abusing
their children sometimes refuse to see what is happening in plain view. If deep, deep denial were a
river in Egypt, American citizens’ wilful blindness would be more like the Marianas Trench.
But thanks to the power of the internet, people everywhere are waking up. The only obvious
non-
psychopath among Republican presidential candidates, Ron Paul, also happens to be the only
candidate in either party with significant grassroots support.
If “love” is embedded in the Revolution Ron Paul heralds, that is because Dr. Paul — a kindly,
soft-
spoken physician who has delivered more than 4,000 babies — implicitly recognizes that
government is the invention and tool of psychopaths, and therefore must be strictly limited in
scope and subjected to a rigorous system of checks and balances, lest the psychopath’s tools, fear
and hatred, replace love as the glue that binds society together.
The decline in militarism since World War II in advanced countries, the spread of literacy and
communications technology, and the people’s growing demands for a better life, together
represent a gathering force that terrifies the pathocracy, (those alternately competing-then-
cooperating gangs of psychopaths who have ruled through lies, fear and intimidation since the
dawn of so-called civilization).
Since nuclear weapons have made war obsolete, the pathocracy is terrified that its favourite
social
control mechanism — ritualized mass slaughter — is increasingly unavailable. And if war was the
great human tragedy, the pathocrats’ pathetic attempt at a war-substitute — the transparently
phoney “war on terror” — is repeating it as sheerest farce.
Truly, we are witnessing the twilight of the psychopaths. Whether in their death throes they
succeed
in pulling down the curtain of eternal night on all of us, or whether we resist them and survive to
see the dawn of a civilization worthy of the name, is the great decision in which all of us others,
however humbly, are now participating.
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/02/02073.html
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
G
Green Mtn
(view)
Corresponds with an Aussie study - which article I can no longer locate, shucks- regarding how the
corporate management environment is perfectly suited to psychopaths advancing faster, and
further up the ladder. Some of the quoted works should make for interesting reading. Comments
desired.
respects
Twilight of the Psychopaths
by Dr. Kevin Barrett
“Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for
maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's
insane about it.” – John Lennon, before his murder by CIA mind-control subject Mark David
Chapman
When Gandhi was asked his opinion of Western civilization he said it would be a good idea.
But that
oft-cited quote, is misleading, assuming as it does thatcivilization is an unmitigated blessing.
Civilized people, we are told, live peacefully and cooperatively with their fellows, sharing the
necessary labour in order to obtain the leisure to develop arts and sciences. And while that wouldbe
a good idea, it is not a good description of what has been going on in the so-called advanced
cultures during the past 8,000 years.
Civilization, as we know it, is largely the creation of psychopaths. All civilizations, our own
included, have been based on slavery and “warfare.” Incidentally, the latter term is a euphemism for
mass murder.
The prevailing recipe for civilization is simple:
1) Use lies and brainwashing to create an army of controlled, systematic mass murderers;
2) Use that army to enslave large numbers of people (i.e. seize control of their labour power
and its
fruits);
3) Use that slave labour power to improve the brainwashing process (by using the economic
surplus to employ scribes, priests, and PR men). Then go back to step one and repeat the process.
Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because
they
are hard-wired to lie, kill, injure, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without
feeling any remorse. The inventor of civilization — the first tribal chieftain who successfully
brainwashed an army of controlled mass murderers—was almost certainly a genetic psychopath.
Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-
psychopaths in the struggle for power in civilizational hierarchies — especially military hierarchies.
Military institutions are tailor-made for psychopathic killers. The 5% or so of human males who feel
no remorse about killing their fellow human beings make the best soldiers. And the 95% who are
extremely reluctant to kill make terrible soldiers — unless they are brainwashed with highly
sophisticated modern techniques that turn them (temporarily it is hoped) into functional
psychopaths.
In On Killing, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman has re-written military history, to highlight what other
histories hide: The fact that military science is less about strategy and technology, than about
overcoming the instinctive human reluctance to kill members of our own species. The true
“Revolution in Military Affairs” was not Donald Rumsfeld’s move to high-tech in 2001, but Brigadier
Gen. S.L.A. Marshall’s discovery in the 1940s that only 15-20% of World War II soldiers along the
line of fire would use their weapons: “Those (80-85%) who did not fire did not run or hide (in many
cases they were willing to risk great danger to rescue comrades, get ammunition, or run messages),
but they simply would not fire their weapons at the enemy, even when faced with repeated waves of
banzai charges” (Grossman, p. 4).
Marshall’s discovery and subsequent research, proved that in all previous wars, a tiny minority
of
soldiers — the 5% who are natural-born psychopaths, and perhaps a few temporarily-insane
imitators—did almost all the killing. Normal men just went through the motions and, if at all
possible, refused to take the life of an enemy soldier, even if that meant giving up their own. The
implication: Wars are ritualized mass murders by psychopaths of non-psychopaths. (This cannot be
good for humanity’s genetic endowment!)
Marshall’s work, brought a Copernican revolution to military science. In the past, everyone
believed
that the soldier willing to kill for his country was the (heroic) norm, while one who refused to fight
was a (cowardly) aberration. The truth, as it turned out, was that the normative soldier hailed from
the psychopathic five percent. The sane majority, would rather die than fight.
The implication, too frightening for even the likes of Marshall and Grossman to fully digest, was
that the norms for soldiers’ behaviour in battle had been set by psychopaths. That meant that
psychopaths were in control of the military as an institution. Worse, it meant that psychopaths were
in control of society’s perception of military affairs. Evidently, psychopaths exercised an enormous
amount of power in seemingly sane, normal society.
How could that be? In Political Ponerology,Andrzej Lobaczewski explains that clinical
psychopaths
enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because
they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie
detector tests) psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court,
for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane
opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the
truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and
then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those
charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military
and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with
psychopaths.
So-called conspiracy theorists, some of whom deserve the pejorative connotation of that
much-
abused term, often imagine that secret societies of Jews, Jesuits, bankers, communists,
Bilderbergers, Muslim extremists, papists, and so on, are secretly controlling history, doing
dastardly deeds, and/or threatening to take over the world. As a leading “conspiracy theorist”
according to Wikipedia, I feel eminently qualified to offer an alternative conspiracy theory which,
like the alternative conspiracy theory of 9/11, is both simpler and more accurate than the prevailing
wisdom: The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of
us.
Behind the apparent insanity of contemporary history, is the actual insanity of psychopaths fighting
to preserve their disproportionate power. And as that power grows ever-more-threatened, the
psychopaths grow ever-more-desperate. We are witnessing the apotheosis of the overworld—the
criminal syndicate or overlapping set of syndicates that lurks above ordinary society and law just as
the underworld lurks below it. In 9/11 and the 9/11 wars, we are seeing the final desperate power-
grab or “endgame” (Alex Jones) of brutal, cunning gangs of CIA drug-runners and President-killers;
money-laundering international bankers and their hit-men, economic and otherwise; corrupt
military contractors and gung-ho generals; corporate predators and their political enablers;
brainwashers and mind-rapists euphemistically known as psy-ops experts and PR specialists—in
short, the whole sick crew of certifiable psychopaths running our so-called civilization. And they
are running scared. It was their terror of losing control that they projected onto the rest of us by
blowing up the Twin Towers and inciting temporary psychopathic terror-rage in the American
public.
Why does the pathocracy fear it is losing control? Because it is threatened by the spread of
knowledge. The greatest fear of any psychopath is of being found out. As George H. W. Bush said to
journalist Sarah McClendon, December 1992, “If the people knew what we had done, they would
chase us down the street and lynch us.” Given that Bush is reported to have participated in parties
where child prostitutes were sodomized and otherwise abused, among his many other crimes, his
statement to McClendon should be taken seriously.
Psychopaths go through life knowing that they are completely different from other people.
They
quickly learn to hide their lack of empathy, while carefully studying others’ emotions so as to mimic
normalcy while cold-bloodedly manipulating the normals.
Today, thanks to new information technologies, we are on the brink of unmasking the
psychopaths
and building a civilization of, by and for the normal human being — a civilization without war, a
civilization based on truth, a civilization in which the saintly few rather than the diabolical few
would gravitate to positions of power. We already have the knowledge necessary to diagnose
psychopathic personalities and keep them out of power. We have the knowledge necessary to
dismantle the institutions in which psychopaths especially flourish — militaries, intelligence
agencies, large corporations, and secret societies. We simply need to disseminate this knowledge,
and the will to use it, as widely as possible.
Above all, we need to inform the public about how psychopaths co-opt and corrupt normal
human
beings. One way they do this, is by manipulating shame and denial — emotions foreign to
psychopaths but common and easily-induced among normals.
Consider how gangs and secret societies (psychopaths’ guilds in disguise) recruit new
members.
Some criminal gangs and satanist covens demand that candidates for admission commit a murder
to “earn their stripes.” Skull and Bones, the Yale-based secret society that supplies the CIA with
drug-runners, mind-rapists, child abusers and professional killers, requires neophytes to lie naked
in a coffin and masturbate in front of older members while reciting the candidate’s entire sexual
history. By forcing the neophyte to engage in ritualized behaviour that would be horrendously
shameful in normal society, the psychopaths’ guild destroys the candidate’s normal personality,
assuming he had one in the first place, and turns the individual into a co-opted, corrupt, degraded
shadow of his former self — a manufactured psychopath or psychopath’s apprentice.
This manipulation of shame has the added benefit of making psychopathic organizations
effectively
invisible to normal society. Despite easily available media reports, American voters in 2004 simply
refused to see that the two major-party presidential candidates had lain naked in a coffin
masturbating in front of older Bonesmen in order to gain admission to Skull and Bones and thus
become members of the criminal overworld. Likewise, many Americans have long refused to see
that hawkish elements of the overworld, operating through the CIA, had obviously been the
murderers of JFK, MLK, RFK, JFK Jr., Malcolm X, ChÈ, AllendÈ, Wellstone, Lumumba, Aguilera, Diem,
and countless other relatively non-psychopathic leaders. They refuse to see the continuing murders
of millions of people around the world in what amounts to an American holocaust. They refuse to
see the evidence that the psychopaths’ guilds running America’s most powerful institutions use the
most horrific forms of sexualized abuse imaginable to induce multiple-personality-disorder in
child victims, then use the resulting mind-control slaves as disposable drug-runners, prostitutes,
Manchurian candidates, and even diplomatic envoys. And of course they refuse to see that 9/11
was a transparently obvious inside job, and that their own psychopath-dominated military-
intelligence apparatus is behind almost every major terrorist outrage of recent decades.
All of this psychopathic behaviour at the top of the social hierarchy is simply too shameful for
ordinary people to see, so they avert their gaze, just as wives of husbands who are sexually abusing
their children sometimes refuse to see what is happening in plain view. If deep, deep denial were a
river in Egypt, American citizens’ wilful blindness would be more like the Marianas Trench.
But thanks to the power of the internet, people everywhere are waking up. The only obvious
non-
psychopath among Republican presidential candidates, Ron Paul, also happens to be the only
candidate in either party with significant grassroots support.
If “love” is embedded in the Revolution Ron Paul heralds, that is because Dr. Paul — a kindly,
soft-
spoken physician who has delivered more than 4,000 babies — implicitly recognizes that
government is the invention and tool of psychopaths, and therefore must be strictly limited in
scope and subjected to a rigorous system of checks and balances, lest the psychopath’s tools, fear
and hatred, replace love as the glue that binds society together.
The decline in militarism since World War II in advanced countries, the spread of literacy and
communications technology, and the people’s growing demands for a better life, together
represent a gathering force that terrifies the pathocracy, (those alternately competing-then-
cooperating gangs of psychopaths who have ruled through lies, fear and intimidation since the
dawn of so-called civilization).
Since nuclear weapons have made war obsolete, the pathocracy is terrified that its favourite
social
control mechanism — ritualized mass slaughter — is increasingly unavailable. And if war was the
great human tragedy, the pathocrats’ pathetic attempt at a war-substitute — the transparently
phoney “war on terror” — is repeating it as sheerest farce.
Truly, we are witnessing the twilight of the psychopaths. Whether in their death throes they
succeed
in pulling down the curtain of eternal night on all of us, or whether we resist them and survive to
see the dawn of a civilization worthy of the name, is the great decision in which all of us others,
however humbly, are now participating.
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/02/02073.html
–--
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.” Wm O. Douglas
