All righty then...Grateful, interesting way of looking at it. At least he mentions discernability. Which brings me to the fact that there are pharmacists that are deciding which prescriptions to fill for women on their personal moral interpretation. A first hand story I recently was told was this: the lady had ovarian cancer. The surgery was set. Her primary care physician, the day before the surgery was to occur, tried to stop the surgery from happening because the chosen surgeon also does abortions. The primary care physician said his reasoning was based on his personal morals. Luckily, her insurance company denied the physicians denial and the surgery went forward as scheduled. If the primary care physician had had his way, the lady would not have been able to have the surgery for another 2 months. Thoughts anyone?
A
Andrea
(view)
All righty then...Grateful, interesting way of looking at it. At least he mentions discernability. Which brings me to the fact that there are pharmacists that are deciding which prescriptions to fill for women on their personal moral interpretation. A first hand story I recently was told was this: the lady had ovarian cancer. The surgery was set. Her primary care physician, the day before the surgery was to occur, tried to stop the surgery from happening because the chosen surgeon also does abortions. The primary care physician said his reasoning was based on his personal morals. Luckily, her insurance company denied the physicians denial and the surgery went forward as scheduled. If the primary care physician had had his way, the lady would not have been able to have the surgery for another 2 months. Thoughts anyone?
