So if Franken and his crack staff (who were totally impartial, I'm sure) called O'Reilly a liar then it must be true. He also called Rush a liar. (Which, in fairness to Al is probably true). But the problem I'm having with Al is there seems to be a lot of lying going on and for some strange reason it all seems so one-sided. Personally I've never considered the democrats the bastions of honesty. But what do I know. I don't have a crack staff of Harvard grads working fevorishly on character assasinations. Maybe this is a prerequisite for working for the NY Times or the LA Times?

Franken has also called Brit Hume a "f*cking asshole". I guess this statement must also be true and easily verifiable. I wonder what research this pronouncement was based on. It has to be based on facts, right? Al isn't someone who'd just say anything about anyone who isn't a liberal, would he?

Nah.