Like I said before, from my experience, juries take their jobs very seriously. Everybody can spin it however they want but TWO juries felt compelled enough to first indict then convict Libby. I read a quote by one juror that although they felt compassion for him and his circumstances (felt he was a strawman), that they still believed that he did in fact commit perjury. Seems pretty cut and dried to me.

Now whether Bush pardons him or not is anybody's guess though.