First, there is a HUGE difference between consent and non-consent.

Second, for all of those Paula Jones believers, go back and find David Brock's original articles written in the American Spectator. (And these are the articles that led to Paula Jone's suit against Clinton) I have read them and her "story" has more holes in it than a sponge. For example, in the article she alledgedly tells the Arkansas state troopers that she would be willing to be Clinton's girlfried. And even though, if true, it is terribly distasteful for Clinton to have dropped his pants and said "kiss it" to Jones, that is still different because he didn't grab her, push her down and grope her as some alledge Arnold has done.

As far as Willey, she too had severe credibitlity issues and followed Clinton around from Ark to Wash. And if you all recall, she also wrote Clinton letters afterwards and said nice things.

Don't know a whole lot of Broderick's background, only that she is about the only one similar to Arnold's behavior.

Flowers was a consentual fling. So, now you have it, 15 women claiming some sort of unwanted behavior versus one on Clinton.

My point in all this is that even though Clinton's pecker should have been cut off long ago and his woman chasing did a a lot of damage, there is still quite a difference between a serial woman chaser versus the serial groper.

And this is what is ticking off a bunch of feminists.....and I don't blame them.