I'm not perfect. If I misinterpreted what you were saying I apologize. I read the whole thread before I posted because I haven't been here in a while. It was sort of a response to all that was discussed. I made the assumption that you posted a response to DeWester stating O'Reilly was fair to both sides:

The original post was just from just watching the show and thinking I would start a yawner thread. Little did I know

"Oreilly goes after both sides equally. Its called the No-Bullshit zone and the left spins more bullshit than the right that's why they think he is right wing"

 I thought you made this statement in reference to your post that started the thread about O'Reilly going after Bush for not yet turning up any WOMD. I sort of saw the thread as a rolling conversation and I tied the two posts together as one thought. But I suppose you could have meant you were throwing your support to John Kerry now and that you actually agree with DeWester about O'Reilly being an idiot gasbag. If that's the case please forgive me.

My subsequent post was made because I see lots of Dems and left wingers on that show do anything but give a straight answer. The right wings do it also just not as much and Oreilly will call both sides when they get evasive on a question.  

See I'm under the weather today and I'm medicated. My head is sort of floating in space. That's why I actually have time to come here and play today. Please help me out here Pat and tell me what you mean so I understand a little better.

It really had no correlation between Oreilly picking to go after WOMD topic and how he treats his guests in the NO BS Zone. You can bet that will be the talking point for every Democrat and CNN and MSNBC if those WOMD are not produced in a couple of more weeks maybe sooner.

Thanks Reg for the reply hoped that helped                                       

--Pat