Here's a perspective from a true conservative, Andrew Sullivan:

My take on this morning's drama: for millions of people, this will mean one thing. They will have an opportunity to purchase healthcare that would otherwise be denied them because of a pre-existing condition or simply lack of means to buy it. This has been done through the private health insurance sector along lines many Republicans were proud of until very recently. And this is a good thing.

The fact that there is no constitutional issue in doing this federally, as opposed to by the states, also removes Mitt Romney's only argument in defense of his own almost identical law in Massachusetts. And so the GOP candidate will be running against his own record in his own state on no rational grounds whatever. And against a Chief Justice appointed by George W. Bush.

But that matters less to me than that someone in America who once had to suffer in silence may now get some help to tackle her health issues. For me, that's a moral principle. Much more needs to be done, specifically in restraining healthcare costs and reforming Medicare. But the core beginning of this process will be getting everyone in the same boat. That now seems unstoppable. So Obama's first term remains historic. And his re-election to cement this change essential.

Peter T. Comment: From the get-go, I've been struck by the hypocrisy of those on the right who consider themselves to be religious. You know, the allegedly love thy neighbor crowd. Their guy, President Bush, didn't make universal healthcare coverage a priority, nor did his compatriots in Congress. What could be more Christ-like than to insure that all Americans have access to a doctor. I'm sure there are problems, possibly big ones, with Obamacare (I hate that term) but it's a start, and hopefully it will improve as time goes on. But dammit, I am proud to live in a country that values all of its citizens and I have no problem paying higher taxes if that's necessary.