Posted on Wed, Nov. 12, 2003
EU vows steel tariff reprisal
By Naomi Koppel
The Associated Press
GENEVA - America's allies appealed to
President Bush on Tuesday to back off support
for the U.S. steel industry or risk billions of
dollars in sanctions that could spark a global
trade war.Members of the European Union are
threatening to impose retaliatory sanctions on
$2.2 billion worth of U.S. imports unless Bush
removes duties on imported steel that he
introduced in March 2002 to give breathing room
to the embattled U.S. steel industry."As frank and loyal friends of the United States,
we hope that Washington will remove as soon
as possible the steel tariffs that are considered
illegal by the World Trade Organization," said
Adolfo Urso, Italy's Industry Ministry
undersecretary in charge of foreign trade. "We
want to ward off a commercial war that, in terms
of its size, would be unprecedented."To ensure that the sanctions hurt as much as
possible, the EU action targets products from
key states, including Florida oranges,
cigarettes, apples and even Harley-Davidson
motorcycles.And the EU is not alone.Norway issued a list of products for possible
retaliation that included steel, clothing, wine,
tobacco, sporting goods and hunting weapons.
China -- the world's biggest steel producer --
and Japan announced that they also were
considering sanctions.The WTO's appeals body -- its highest tribunal --
ruled Monday that Bush's so-called safeguard
duties of up to 30 percent are illegal under
international rules. The decision, made after
complaints from the EU and seven other
countries, is binding.The United States criticized the ruling and
insisted that it was right in imposing the tariffs
for three years to allow the recession-plagued
industry time to restructure. It made no
immediate announcement about its next step.Bush is facing a tricky political balancing act. If
he maintains the duties, he will have to deal
with the sanctions. But if he removes the duties,
he will anger steel states like Pennsylvania,
Ohio and West Virginia.Stuart Eizenstat, a former U.S. ambassador to
the EU and top Clinton administration official,
said he believed Bush officials should drop the
duties."Having put [the duties] on, they've gotten the
political advantage. Now they ought to be able to
point to the WTO decision and say, 'We tried our
best and now it's time to lift them,' " Eizenstat
told The Associated Press.Bush also faces domestic pressure to remove
the tariffs, especially from steel-dependent
industries like automakers. Those industries
say the action has led to job losses in
manufacturing industries and increased the
cost of products for consumers.
B
Baerwald
(view)
Posted on Wed, Nov. 12, 2003
EU vows steel tariff reprisal
By Naomi Koppel
The Associated Press
GENEVA - America's allies appealed to
President Bush on Tuesday to back off support
for the U.S. steel industry or risk billions of
dollars in sanctions that could spark a global
trade war.Members of the European Union are
threatening to impose retaliatory sanctions on
$2.2 billion worth of U.S. imports unless Bush
removes duties on imported steel that he
introduced in March 2002 to give breathing room
to the embattled U.S. steel industry."As frank and loyal friends of the United States,
we hope that Washington will remove as soon
as possible the steel tariffs that are considered
illegal by the World Trade Organization," said
Adolfo Urso, Italy's Industry Ministry
undersecretary in charge of foreign trade. "We
want to ward off a commercial war that, in terms
of its size, would be unprecedented."To ensure that the sanctions hurt as much as
possible, the EU action targets products from
key states, including Florida oranges,
cigarettes, apples and even Harley-Davidson
motorcycles.And the EU is not alone.Norway issued a list of products for possible
retaliation that included steel, clothing, wine,
tobacco, sporting goods and hunting weapons.
China -- the world's biggest steel producer --
and Japan announced that they also were
considering sanctions.The WTO's appeals body -- its highest tribunal --
ruled Monday that Bush's so-called safeguard
duties of up to 30 percent are illegal under
international rules. The decision, made after
complaints from the EU and seven other
countries, is binding.The United States criticized the ruling and
insisted that it was right in imposing the tariffs
for three years to allow the recession-plagued
industry time to restructure. It made no
immediate announcement about its next step.Bush is facing a tricky political balancing act. If
he maintains the duties, he will have to deal
with the sanctions. But if he removes the duties,
he will anger steel states like Pennsylvania,
Ohio and West Virginia.Stuart Eizenstat, a former U.S. ambassador to
the EU and top Clinton administration official,
said he believed Bush officials should drop the
duties."Having put [the duties] on, they've gotten the
political advantage. Now they ought to be able to
point to the WTO decision and say, 'We tried our
best and now it's time to lift them,' " Eizenstat
told The Associated Press.Bush also faces domestic pressure to remove
the tariffs, especially from steel-dependent
industries like automakers. Those industries
say the action has led to job losses in
manufacturing industries and increased the
cost of products for consumers.
