Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
I don't know...how would you feel about going on national tv to discuss your sexual habits and have a team come in to photograph your naughty bits? I mean sure there are plenty of people on tv now that seem to love to do just that but I think it's pretty strange and just a bad idea to make a president do it. How was his affair with Monica relevant to anything except to drag him through the muck and embarrass him? Ken Starr started out investigating Whitewater with a key witness that was being paid by rightwing kooks and ended by dropping Whitewater in favor of turning in a sexually explicit novel to the Congress. If you ask me Starr was the sicker of the two main characters in that movie. In fact when I saw him on tv I thought, this guy belongs in a padded cell.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
Reg
(view)
I don't know...how would you feel about going on national tv to discuss your sexual habits and have a team come in to photograph your naughty bits? I mean sure there are plenty of people on tv now that seem to love to do just that but I think it's pretty strange and just a bad idea to make a president do it. How was his affair with Monica relevant to anything except to drag him through the muck and embarrass him? Ken Starr started out investigating Whitewater with a key witness that was being paid by rightwing kooks and ended by dropping Whitewater in favor of turning in a sexually explicit novel to the Congress. If you ask me Starr was the sicker of the two main characters in that movie. In fact when I saw him on tv I thought, this guy belongs in a padded cell.
–--
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
'The only way to avoid getting crushed by absurdity, is to humbly include the absurd in our calculations.'
posted 2007.02.24
posted on February 24th 2007
Reg
location: back to the wilderness
listening to: static
registered: 1999.11.22
posts: 6470
[view all posts]
[view all posts]
-
Bravo! – dale on February 19th, 2007-
Re: Bravo! – kravitz on February 19th, 2007-
Re: Bravo! – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Bravo! – MJG on February 20th, 2007-
Dale, I Will Speak Slowly, In Words Of One Syllable – Baerwald on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Dale, I Will Speak Slowly, In Words Of One Syllable – dale on February 20th, 2007-
So Dale... One question.. – edlorah on February 20th, 2007-
Re: So Dale... One question.. – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Re: So Dale... One question.. – edlorah on February 20th, 2007-
Re: So Dale... One question.. – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Re: So Dale... One question.. – edlorah on February 20th, 2007-
Re: So Dale... One question.. – messybear on February 23rd, 2007
Re: So Dale... One question.. – pkjensen on February 20th, 2007
Re: Dale, I Will Speak Slowly, In Words Of One Syllable – Baerwald on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Dale, I Will Speak Slowly, In Words Of One Syllable – dale on February 20th, 2007
Re: Dale, I Will Speak Slowly, In Words Of One Syllable – Eugene on February 20th, 2007
In Words Of One Syllable – messybear on March 1st, 2007-
The F-Words Of One (correction [fwiw] ) – messybear on March 22nd, 2007
Brzezinski, Islamo-facism, and Dale – Reg on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Brzezinski, Islamo-facism, and Dale – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Length and Mitt – Reg on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Length and Mitt – dale on February 22nd, 2007
Re: Bravo! – Reg on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Bravo! – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Bravo! – Reg on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Now Reg.... – dale on February 20th, 2007-
Re: Now Dale.... – pkjensen on February 21st, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – dale on February 21st, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – Baerwald on February 21st, 2007-
Re: Now DB... – dale on February 21st, 2007-
Re: Now look What You've Done DB... – edlorah on February 21st, 2007-
Re: Now look What You've Done DB... – dale on February 21st, 2007
Re: Now DB... – pkjensen on February 22nd, 2007
...and WHO are the Left anyways? – edlorah on February 21st, 2007
Re: Now PK... – pkjensen on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – dale on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – pkjensen on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – dale on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Now PK... – pkjensen on February 22nd, 2007
Sorry, but this fits here... – Reg on February 22nd, 2007
Dale... – Kevin G on February 22nd, 2007-
Kevin... – edlorah on February 22nd, 2007-
Ed – Kevin G on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Ed – edlorah on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Ed – dale on February 22nd, 2007
umm... – Reg on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: umm... – edlorah on February 22nd, 2007
Good post, Kev – Reg on February 22nd, 2007
Re: Now Reg.... – Reg on February 22nd, 2007-
Groupthink – Baerwald on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Groupthink – dale on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – dale on February 22nd, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 23rd, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Reg on February 23rd, 2007-
Okay Reg... – edlorah on February 23rd, 2007-
Re: Okay Reg... – Reg on February 24th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – pkjensen on February 24th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Reg on February 24th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 26th, 2007-
I know Dale will bash me for posting another quote... – Reg on February 26th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Eugene on February 26th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 26th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – stark raving brad on February 27th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – dale on February 27th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Reg on February 27th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 27th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – dale on February 27th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – Baerwald on February 27th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – pkjensen on February 27th, 2007-
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – dale on February 27th, 2007-
Once again Dale, you completely miss the mark. – pkjensen on February 27th, 2007
Sorry, Dale Shot First – edlorah on February 27th, 2007
Re: Groupthink... Edited. Sorry, Dale, Shot first, thought later. – messybear on February 27th, 2007
Re: Groupthink- edited for humorous content not for snarkiness.. – edlorah on February 22nd, 2007
Well Dale... – Reg on February 22nd, 2007
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
